Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Radico Khaitan Ltd.
Judges: R Agrawal, K Ojha
14 September, 2004·(iv) CIT v. H.R. Sugar Factory (1991) 190 ITR 643 (All); (v) CIT v. Saraya Sugar Mills (P) Ltd. (1992) 193 ITR 575 (All); and (vi) CIT v. Saraya Sugar Mills (P) Ltd. (1993) 201 ITR 181 (All). 8. So far as the investment allowance is concerned, he submitted that no investment allowance under Section ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sri Bhagwan Gupta vs Kanpur Electricity Supply ...
Judges: A Bhushan
14 September, 2004·Where L = is the connected load in KW. H = is the average number of hours per day the supply is made available in the Distribution mains, feeding the consumer. D = If the number of days for which the theft took place can be ascertained on the basis of satisfactory evidence then actual number of days...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income-Tax And ... vs Sir Shadilal Enterprises Ltd.
Judges: R Agrawal, K Ojha
14 September, 2004·"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was legally correct in confirming the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) decision in holding that mere passing a journal entry mentioning utilisation of investment allowance reserve fulfils the r...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Committee Of Management, Shiksha ... vs Assistant Registrar, Firms, ...
Judges: A Tandon
14 September, 2004·4. The contentions raised on behalf of the petitioners are not sustainable in the eyes of law for the following reasons, namely,- (a) the Assistant Registrar has made specific reference to the order passed by the prescribed authority in exercise of jurisdiction under Section 25(1) of the Act dated 6...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Mahavir Jute Mills Ltd.
Judges: R Agrawal, K Ojha
14 September, 2004·2. Briefly stated the facts giving rise to the present reference are as follows : The present reference relates to asst. yr. 1977-78. For the assessment year in question, the respondent had claimed a deduction of Rs. 14,615 being legal expenses. While framing the assessment under Section 143(3)/144B...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Prem Shanker Singh vs Accounts Officer And Ors.
Judges: T Agarwala
14 September, 2004·The petitioner seeks issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the opposite parties to pay salary to the petitioner on month to month basis including arrears. The learned counsel has placed reliance on an order passed by Zila Basic Shiksha Adhikari, Ballia, vide order dated 24.8.96 a co...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Yagya Dutt Mishra And Ors. vs State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: N Mehrotra
14 September, 2004·4. The opposite parties No. 3 to 5 have filed the counter-affidavit. The petitioners' Counsel has given the statement that the petitioner do not want to file any rejoinder affidavit. 5. Technical education is the subject of concurrent list. In the year 1987, the Parliament has passed "All India Coun...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Cit vs Radico Khaitan Ltd.
Judges:
14 September, 2004·(vi) CIT v. Saraya Sugar Mills (P) Ltd. (1993) 201 ITR 181 (All.) 8. So far as the investment allowance is concerned, he submitted that no investment allowance under section 32A of the Act is admissible as the assessee-company is engaged in the manufacture or production of beer, wine and other alcoh...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Baccha vs Deputy Director Of Consolidation ...
Judges: A Bhushan
14 September, 2004·5. Shri R. N. Ojha learned counsel appearing for the respondent refuted the submission of the counsel for the petitioner and contended that the Settlement Officer Consolidation has rightly rejected the appeal of the petitioner as not maintainable. He contended that appeal under Section 11 of the Act...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Phool Chand Singh vs Ram Khelawan And Anr.
Judges: P Krishna
13 September, 2004·6. Before coming to the merit of appeal it is desirable to decide about the maintainability of appeal. An appeal shall lie under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act against an award passed under Section 168 of the Act. Learned counsel for the respondent submitted that since in the present case del...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.