Cit vs Ram Prasad
Judges:
25 October, 2004·2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present reference are as follows: 2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present reference are as follows: The respondent-assessee is a Hindu Undivided Family and was a partner in a registered firm M/s. Bhagwati Prasad Ram Swarup, through its ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shri Nath vs Iiird Additional District Judge ...
Judges: S Khan
25 October, 2004·1. This is landlords writ petition arising out of a suit (S.C.C. Suit No. 6 of 1979) filed by him against tenant-respondent No. 2 for eviction on the ground of default and for recovery of arrears of rent J.S.C.C./Special Judge, Mathura through judgment and decree dated 6.3.1980 decreed the suit for ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Abdullah vs District Magistrate And Anr.
Judges: V Sahai, T Agarwala
25 October, 2004·1. The Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat Dasna, District Ghaziabad, respondent No. 2 published a notice in the newspaper for auctioning the land of Dasna Nagar Panchayat. The petitioner participated in this auction and was the highest bidder for plot No. 1231, measuring five biswa for Rs. 6,31,469/...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
S.M.I. Kazim vs New India Assurance Co. Ltd. And ...
Judges: S R Alam, M Prasad
15 October, 2004·3. It is alleged that Shri S.M.I. Kazim, with ulterior motive and malafide intention settled Claim No. 44/93/005 under Boiler Insurance Policy No. 4442170233001 A/c. M/s. Balarampur Chini Mills Ltd. for a sum of Rs. 3,84,450/- by appointing different surveyors in order to obtain a favourable survey ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Intzar vs Deputy Director Of Consolidation ...
Judges: S Singh
15 October, 2004·3. Learned counsel for the petitioner raised four points for consideration which can be summarised thus : (1) Unless and until order of the Settlement Officer, Consolidation is implemented and delivery of possession takes place, stay order cannot be granted. (2) Even there may be a peculiar fact but...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Krishi Disc. P. Ltd.
Judges: R Agrawal, P Krishna
15 October, 2004·"1. Whether, on the facts and in law, the Tribunal was right in holding that a new industrial undertaking for manufacture of knives and come into existence and was entitled to Section 80J deduction for the assessment years 1978-79 and 1979-80 ? 2. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sheshdhar Awasthi Son Of Sri ... vs State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: R Misra
15 October, 2004·8. It was also argued on behalf of the petitioners that in (2000) 9 SCC- 283 (Munna Roy v. Union of India and Ors. ), the Supreme Court after acknowledging that mere inclusion in select list does not confer any right to the Selectee and mandamus could not be issued but the Court could, interfere whe...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Cit vs Janta Cold Storage
Judges:
15 October, 2004·"Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income tax Appellate Tribunal was right to cancel the order passed by the Commissioner of Income-tax under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, by holding that the process of manufacture was there in the cold storage ?" Briefly stat...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mahender Kumar Aggarwal vs Commissioner Of Income Tax
Judges: R Agrawal, K Ojha
15 October, 2004·5. CIT v. Penwalt India Ltd. (1992) 196 ITR 813 (Bom). 5. Shri Shambhoo Chopra, learned standing counsel, submitted that the applicant-unit cannot be said to be an industrial undertaking within the meaning of Section 80I of the Act. According to him the Expln. 3 to Section 80-I(2) of the Act gives t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Deoki Nandan Chaurasiya Son Of ... vs Bakshi Brothers A Partnership ...
Judges: P Srivastava
15 October, 2004·2. The writ petition arises out of the. execution proceedings in Execution Case No. 26 of 2000, Bakshi Brothers v. Deoki Nandan Chaurasiya in Civil Suit No. 431 of 1988 for recovery of a sum of Rs. 32,654.86/-. According to the petitioner, a compromise was entered into between the parties. They agre...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.