Jai Ram And Ors. vs The District Judge And Ors.
Judges: D Singh
03 August, 2004·3. This petition has been filed claiming the relief of mandamus directing the respondents to appoint the petitioner in the Subordinate Courts at Mau. 4. In pursuance of an advertisement dated 26.6.1990 inviting applications for appointment on posts of Process Server, Orderlies, Peons, Office Peons a...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bharat Pumps And Compressors ... vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh And Ors.
Judges: A Kumar
02 August, 2004·"KYA SEVAYOJKON DWARA APNE SHRAMIK RAMCHANDRA SAROJ (PUTRA SRI SITARAM) FITTER KO DINANK 7.8.1979 SE SEVA SAMAPT KIYA JANA UCHIT TATHA/ATHVA VAIDHANIK HAI. YADI NAHIN, TO SAMBHANDHIT SHRAMIK KYA LABH/ANUTOSH (RELIEF) PANE KA ADHIKARI HAI TATHA KIS ANYA VIVRAN SAHIT ?" 3. On the receipt of the refere...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Wealth Tax vs Phool Chand
Judges: R Agrawal, K Ojha
02 August, 2004·The assessee opposite party is an individual, who owned a cinema building, the construction of which was completed on 31st March, 1970. It started running the cinema w.e.f. 20th April, 1970. While framing the assessment under the Act, the WTO referred the valuation of the cinema building to a valuat...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Udai Pratan Singh Son Of Surendra ... vs Adhyaksh Nagar Palika And ...
Judges: R Misra
02 August, 2004·17. Right to work is not a fundamental right but a right to be considered for appointment is as enshrined under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India. 18. It cannot, thus, be stated that the petitioner had been appointed upon compliance of the recruitment process as envisaged under the Edu...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Plastic Products Ltd.
Judges: R Agrawal, K Ojha
02 August, 2004·"1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstance of the case, the Tribunal was legally correct in holding that the plastic manufactured by the assessee was petro-chemical within the meaning of item No. 18 of the Sixth Schedule and, hence, entitled to the relief under Section 80I r/w Section 80B(7) ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Laxmi Kant Girdhar Lal And Ors. vs Prescribed Authority/Munsif And ...
Judges: Y Tripathi
02 August, 2004·1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners. None responds for the respondents even on revision of the list. 2. This writ petition has been filed for issue of writ of certiorari quashing the order dated 15.7.1986 contained in Annexure-XIII of the writ petition passed by the Prescribed Authority, Kh...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Additional Commissioner Of ... vs Hindustan Traders
Judges: R Agrawal, K Ojha
02 August, 2004·2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present reference are as follows : The respondent-assessee is a firm and was assessed as a registered firm upto the asst. yr. 1964-65. For the asst. yr. 1965-66 a declaration in Form No. 12, as required by Section 184(7) of the Act, was filed. In the c...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.