Universal Construction And ... vs Garhwal Mandal Vikas Nigam Ltd. ...
Judges: N Mehrotra
08 October, 2003·(a) the defendant, or each of the defendants where there are more than one, at the time of the commencement of the suit, actually and voluntarily resides, or carries on business, or personally works for gain; or (b) any of the defendants, where there are more than one, at the time of the commencemen...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sheo Baran Singh Chauhan vs Ordinance Equipment Factory And ...
Judges: M Katju, U Pandey
01 October, 2003·2. It is alleged in Para 1 of the petition that the petitioner was working as Secretary in the respondent-Society which is Co-operative Society registered under the Co-operative Societies Act, 1965. It is alleged in Para 2 of the petition that the petitioner was appointed as Secretary under Section ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Wealth Tax vs Pramod Kumar
Judges: M Katju, U Pandey
01 October, 2003·1. In this case there is an office report dt. 27th Feb., 1984 that notice has been served on the assessee. None has appeared on his behalf. Since this is an old reference we are not adjourning the case. 2. This is a wealth-tax reference Under Section 27(1) of the WT Act in which the following questi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jubilant Organosys (Formerly Vam ... vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Judges: M Katju, U Pandey
01 October, 2003·4. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the Commissioner of Income-tax was not justified in invoking the provisions of Section 263 of the Income-tax Act as the order of the Assessing Officer was not prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue nor was it erroneous. 5. A perusal of the ord...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Sheela Devi Chauhan And Ors. vs Smt. Sunita Devi And Ors.
Judges: Y Tripathi
01 October, 2003·1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed seeking a direction in the nature of mandamus against the opposite party No. 2 for not proceeding in any way and staying further proceeding of complaint case bearing No. 2842 of 2002, Smt. Sunita Devi v. Sudhir Singh and ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Rabia And Ors. vs Addl. District Judge And Ors.
Judges: S Khan
01 October, 2003·1. This writ petition has been filed by defendants. Respondent No. 4 Mohd. Shafi filed a suit against the petitioners who are wife, sons and daughters of his late brother Mohd. Yameen. One of the petitioner is minor. In this case arguments were heard on 18.7.2003 and judgment was reserved with liber...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kamal Kumar Mehta vs State Of U.P. And Ors.
Judges: M Katju, U Pandey
01 October, 2003·1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This special appeal has been filed against the impugned Judgment of the learned single Judge. The appellant has filed this appeal on the ground that he and his wife are living in Ballia and his wife is also in service. The learned single Judge has noted t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Prakash Enterprises And Company vs State Of Uttar Pradesh And Ors.
Judges: M Katju, U Pandey
01 October, 2003·4. The petitioner applied for a term loan from Syndicate Bank which was duly sanctioned to the petitioner through Shri Atul Prakash. 5. The petitioner was granted registration as a small-scale industrial unit for which the application was filed on December 13,1988 (vide annexure 3 to the writ petiti...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dr. Shiv Mangal Singh Rathore vs Ram Jeevan Rathore
Judges: N Mehrotra
01 October, 2003·2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuing a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned judgment and order dated 20.2.1997 passed by the trial court as contained in Annexure-1 to the writ petition. 3. It appears that the opposite party is the la...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Purshottam Sutwala vs Pradeshiya Industrial And ...
Judges: A Yog, V Singh
01 October, 2003·11. Whatever be the position, from the pleadings of the petitioner himself it is clear that scheme approved by the BIFR was never accepted and/or acted upon and hence the petitioner or the company cannot take advantage whatsoever of the revival scheme being formulated by the BIFR or plead that new a...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.