Digvijay Narain Singh vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Anr.
Judges: M Katju, U Pandey
19 November, 2003·2. The petitioner has challenged the constitutional validity of the proviso to Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which permits the application under Section 256(1) to be filed within further period not exceeding 30 days than that prescribed in the main part of Section 256(1), i.e., 60 days...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Gyan Chand Gupta vs Chief General Manager, S.B.I. And ...
Judges: M Katju, U Pandey
19 November, 2003·2. The petitioner is challenging the impugned order dated 16.12.1985 passed by the Chief General Manager/ Disciplinary Action Cell. State Bank of India, New Delhi copy of which is Annexure-5 to the petition. By that order the petitioner has been dismissed from the service of the State Bank of India....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shilpa Knitwears And Anr. vs State Of Uttar Pradesh And Ors.
Judges: M Katju, U Pandey
19 November, 2003·5. In this connection a letter dated September 25, 1992 (vide annexure 5) was sent by the Joint Director of Industries to the Deputy Commissioner, Trade Tax to inform the alleged misuse. A perusal of the said letter of the Joint Director, Industries, who is the Convener of the Divisional Level Commi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohammad Mukhtar Ahmad Raza vs Gulam Abdul Qadir Alvi
Judges: J Sahai
19 November, 2003·1. A suit was filed by the plaintiff-respondent Gulam Abdul Qadir Alvi against the petitioner for injunction and declaration as Sajjada Nashin of Khankah Faizul Rasool. The plaintiff's case is that after the previous Sajjada Nashin died there was an election by the executive committee in which the p...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Vipul Agarwal vs Atul Kanodia And Co. And Anr.
Judges: J Sahai
19 November, 2003·3. I have heard Sri Ashutosh Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Shashi Kant Gupta, learned counsel for the respondent. 4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that no appeal is provided against the award. It is only when an application to set aside the award...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Brijraj Kishore Pandey vs Commissioner, Allahabad ...
Judges: R Tiwari
19 November, 2003·3. The facts as emerge from the records are that the petitioner was attacked in 1982 by some miscreants due to enmity in the village and an F.I.R. was lodged by him under Sections 147, 148, 149, 336, 307 and 323, I.P.C., P.S. Kunda, District Pratapgarh, in said criminal case main accused was convict...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Suresh Chand vs Presiding Officer, Labour Court ...
Judges: A Kumar
18 November, 2003·2. The following dispute was referred to before the Labour Court for adjudication. ^^D;k lsok;kstdksa }kjk vius Jfed Jh lqjs'k pUnz] iq= Jh psrjke] ifjpkyd dh lsok;sa vkns'k fnukad 4-11-91 ls lekIr fd;k tkuk mfpr [email protected] oS/kkfud gSa\ ;fn ugha] rks lEcfU/kr Jfed fdl ykHk mi'ke ikus dk vf/k...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
U.P. State Electricity Board vs Presiding Officer, Labour Court ...
Judges: A Kumar
18 November, 2003·2. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 3. The case set up by the workman-respondent, in short, before the Labour Court is that the aforesaid workman has been retired by the petitioner-employers on an incorrect entry of the date of birth without his actually attaining the age of...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Chandrakanta Shukla And Anr. vs Smt. Mahima Gupta
Judges: K Rakhra
18 November, 2003·4. The main contention of the petitioner was that there was no bona fide need of the landlord for the premises in question and the comparative hardship was in favour of the tenant. Some other pleas about the maintainability of the release application were also raised. This written statement was file...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Cit vs Sahara Investment India Ltd.
Judges:
18 November, 2003·3. The assessee is a Company registered under the Indian Companies Act. It does not business of collecting deposits from the public under different finance schemes. The relevant assessment year is 1991-92. In respect of this assessment year, the assessee had declared a loss of Rs. 6,24,147 but the a...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.