Kailash Chand Singhal vs Sri Krishna Janam Asthan
Judges: S Srivastava
13 December, 2002·7. The trial court considered the oral evidence and documentary evidence brought on record. It was found that the notice terminating the tenancy was perfect and valid in law. The plea that the suit was bad for multifariousness of causes of action was also negatived. The trial court further came to t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Cit vs Amar Iron Stores
Judges:
13 December, 2002·"Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was legally correct in upholding the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) that two assessments should have been made and the income of Rs. 1,14,420 for the period 21-9-1976 to 31-3-1977 as deleted from the hands of the appellant...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mahendra Narain Singh And Anr. vs Varanasi Development Authority ...
Judges: S Srivastava, D Chaudhary
13 December, 2002·2. The petitioners feel aggrieved by an order passed by the Vice-chairman of the Varanasi Development Authority, Varanasi, dated 18.11.2002 communicated on 20.11.2002, whereby the Zonal Officer has been directed to initiate immediate action for demolition of the constructions in dispute, recalling t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Praveen Kumar Gupta vs District Magistrate/Collector ...
Judges: G Mathur, A Bhushan
13 December, 2002·3. Sri A. K. Mishra, counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner having been already detained in civil prison from 10.8.1999 to 25.10.1999, he cannot be again arrested on the basis of citation dated 30.10.2002. The counsel for the petitioner contended that maximum period prescribed unde...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Neena Singh (Dr.) vs State Of U.P. And 3 Ors.
Judges: M Katju, Y Singh
13 December, 2002·1. The petitioner is challenging the suspension order dated 26.11.2002, Annexure-1 to the petition and transfer order dated 14.11.2002, Annexure-13 to the petition. 2. As regards the transfer order dated 14.11.2002 it has been challenged earlier in Writ Petition No. 51307 of 2002, Annexure-4 to the ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Tej Narain Misra vs Central Administrative Tribunal ...
Judges: M Katju, Y Singh
13 December, 2002·1. Heard counsel for the petitioner and Sri Tarun Verma for the Railway. 2. Petitioner is challenging the impugned order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Annexure-12 to the petition. The petitioner was transferred from Deoria to Siwan in 1990 but for 12 years thereafter he has not yet vacated...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Brij Pal Singh And Anr.
Judges: G Mathur, V Saran
13 December, 2002·10. The claimant also adduced some documentary evidence in support of his case. He filed copies of the F.I.R. of Case Crime No. 517 of 1997 of P. S. Barot, copy of the charge-sheet, copy of the site plan prepared by the Investigating Officer and some other documents. 11. We have given above the gist...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Committee Of Management, ... vs V.B.S. Purvanchal University And ...
Judges: G Mathur, A Bhushan
13 December, 2002·9. The first statutes of the University have been framed under Section 49 of the U. P. State Universities Act, 1973. It is admitted to both the parties that first statutes of the Gorakhpur University are applicable to Veer Bahadur Singh Purvanchal University, Jaunpur, Chapter 13 of the Statutes deal...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Naveen Gun House And Ors. vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors.
Judges: G Mathur, N Mehrotra
13 December, 2002·(D) Renewal of licence relating to arms or ammunitions on following Forms as set out in Schedule III to the Arms Rules, 1962 : (i) Form XI Three thousand rupees. (ii) Form XII Three thousand rupees. (tit) Form XIII Two thousand rupees. (iv) Form XIV One thousand rupees. 3. It is the aforesaid amendm...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shafiq Ahmad vs Additional District And Sessions ...
Judges: S Mehrotra
13 December, 2002·11. Coming to the first contention raised on behalf of the petitioner, the provisions of Section 2 (1) (f) were not attracted to the present case and the disputed accommodation could not be exempted from the purview of the Act on the basis of the said provision. It will be pertinent to reproduce Sec...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.