Om Prakash Sharma vs Regional Transport Authority, ...
Judges: A Desai, O Bhatt
13 September, 1999·2. The learned counsel for the parties agree that in these three writ petitions, facts and circumstances are identical. We, therefore, propose to dispose of all the three writ petitions together. 3. The petitioners are operators of different routes. They had objections for grant of permit to any oth...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
M.R. Compound And Allied Products ... vs Cegat
Judges: P Jain
13 September, 1999·4. Sri A.P. Mathur, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Shri S.P. Kesarvani, learned standing counsel for the Union of India-respondents have been heard. 5. Submission of Shri Mathur is that the specific plea regarding the demand being barred by limitation was taken before the Commissioner as wel...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Amar Babu Srivastava vs State Of U.P. And Others
Judges: O Garg
13 September, 1999·"This writ petition is finally disposed of with direction that the respondent No. 2 shall himself look into the matter and pass appropriate orders for release of salary to the petitioner if the petitioner has remained in service throughout this period, and also release the salary forthwith in respec...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Banaras Beads Ltd. vs Shristi Carriers Pvt. Ltd.
Judges: S Narain
13 September, 1999·(3) The agent, subject to his willingness and agreeing to invest in the rights issue specified by the principal in terms of Clause (2) above, shall arrange to apply for the number of debentures specified by the principal provided however that the amount of applications shall not exceed the amount av...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Hari Kishan Gupta And Others vs Civil Judge, Kannauj And Others
Judges: D Seth
13 September, 1999·Rejection of application.--The Court shall reject an application for permission to sue as an indigent person : (a) where it Is not framed and presented in the manner prescribed by Rules 2 and 3, or (b) where the applicant is not an indigent person or (c) where he has, within two months next before t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rajendra Singh vs Chancellor, Kashi Vidyapith, ...
Judges: B K Roy, L Bihari
13 September, 1999·It further transpires that another lecturer, namely. Dr. Smt. Gayatri Devi was also similarly appointed as the petitioner and the terms and conditions of initial appointment were identical. In the supplementary affidavit, it has been stated that the aforesaid Dr. Shambhoo Nath Upadhya and the afores...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner, Sales Tax vs New India Insurance Co. Ltd.
Judges: P Jain
13 September, 1999·1. Heard Sri R.D. Gupta, learned Standing Counsel for the revisionist and Sri Bharatji Agrawal, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the assessee. In all the four revisions common questions of law and facts are involved. Therefore, the same are being disposed by common judgment. In the assessment ye...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Krishna Kumar Sharma vs Iind Additional District Judge, ...
Judges: D Seth
10 September, 1999·3. Learned counsel for the petitioner Mr. S. K. Misra contends that the petitioner has been able to make out a prima facie as is apparent from the plaint and the application for injunction supported by an affidavit and also by production of documents on which he relied upon. But the learned trial co...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Naseem Begum And Others vs Ixth Additional District Judge, ...
Judges: A Yog
10 September, 1999·2. The question raised is whether the notice determining tenancy by giving thirty days time but giving 15 days to deposit arrear and rent is valid or not. 3. In view of the decisions in Chhotey Lal v. Gajadhar Prasad, 1954 AWC 166, rendered by a Division Bench consisting of Malik, C.J. and D. N. Roy...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Virendra Kumar Singh vs Xith Additional District Judge, ...
Judges: D Seth
10 September, 1999·3. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner at length. 4. The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution. The same is liable to be restored under Order XL1, Rule 19 of the Code of Civil Procedure, if sufficient cause is shown. Whether the appeal is maintainable or not cannot be a consideration ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.