Rama Devi vs Prescribed Authority, Civil ...
Judges: Y Singh
30 September, 1999·Her (the daughter's) name is Smt. Rama Devi and not Ram Devi as claimed by the mother. The sale deed could not be in favour of her mother as her name ts Ram Kali and not Rama Devi. She (the daughter) has perfected her rights by adverse possession. The daughter had also filed an Original Suit No. 692...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rajesh Prasad Tiwari vs Registrar, Co-Operative ...
Judges: M Katju, D Chaudhary
30 September, 1999·1. This writ petition has been filed praying for a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to pay salary to the petitioner in the revised scale of Rs, 975-1.660 w.e.f. 1.4.1989 as applicable to the Secretary grade II and for a mandamus directing the respondents to absorb the petitioner on the pos...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Committee Of Management Ekbal ... vs Joint Director Of Education, ...
Judges: D Sinha, I Quddusi
30 September, 1999·Sahai, learned counsel appearing for the respondent-appellants. Dr. R. G. Padia. learned Senior Advocate. appearing for the petitioner-respondent Nos. 3 and 4 and Shri Vinay Malviya, learned standing counsel of the State of U. P.. representing the respondent Nos- 1 and 2. 2. By his order and judgmen...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sohan Singh And Anr. vs The District Inspector Of Schools ...
Judges: R Agrawal
30 September, 1999·4. Mr. Padia has invited the attention of this Court to the U.P. Secondary Education Services Commission (Amendment) Act, 1998 (U.P. Act No. 25 of 1998). Section 10 of the said Act inserted Sections 33-C and 33-D in the Principal Act. Section 33-C which is relevant for the purposes of deciding the p...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shamshad Ahmad Khan vs District Inspector Of Schools, ...
Judges: M Katju
30 September, 1999·2. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. In this case counter-affidavit has been filed by the respondent No. 4 but no counter-affidavit has been filed by respondent Nos. 1 and 2 although one month's time for filing counter-affidavit was granted by this Court on 27.7.98. It is alleged in para...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Hausila Prasad vs Deputy Director Of ...
Judges: Naseemuddin
30 September, 1999·21. Sections 8, 54 (2) (d). After the test and verification of the annual register as prescribed in Rules 19, 20 and 20A) a field-to-field partal of all the plots shall be carried out by the Consolidator in association with the Consolidation Committee and as many tenure-holders of the village as he ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Goverdhan Dass Mahendra Kumar
Judges:
29 September, 1999·2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was legally correct in holding that the disallowance of a sum of Rs. 5,322 being payment of interest to Shyam Lal Surender Kumar could not be made under section 40(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ?" The said questions are sta...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Goverdhan Dass Mahendra Kumar
Judges: M Agarwal, S R Alam
29 September, 1999·"1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was legally correct in holding that the disallowance of the sum of Rs. 12,244 being payment of interest to Mahindra Kumar Sewati Devi could not be made under Section 40(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ?" 2. Whether, on the f...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Babibur Rahman vs Rasheed Ahmad And Others
Judges: D Seth
29 September, 1999·7. If it is a suit not covered by the 1972 Act. then having related to an Interest in the immovable property, the same is excluded from the purview of Provincial Small Cause Courts Act by reason of Section 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure, read with Section 15 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Ac...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kakar Sugar Works vs State Of U.P. And Others
Judges: P Jain
29 September, 1999·3. The respondents have filed counter-affidavit in which it is stated that on 7.1.95 information was given by the petitioner and no date was fixed from which the petitioner was to operate his unit and he had thus violated the provisions of Rule 13A of the Rules framed under the Act. It was admitted ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.