Virendra Bahadur Singh vs District Judge, Faizabad And ...
Judges: R Zaidi
03 November, 1999·ant Kumari Sudha Singh, VIth Addl. Munsif Magistrate, Faizabad. two peons Ram Kewal and Abdul Wahid were not examined in the case and the petitioner was also not afforded opportunity to cross-examine the said witnesses. Therefore, the charges levelled against the petitioner cannot be held to have be...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Pravesh Castings (P) Ltd. vs Commr. Of C. Ex.
Judges: M Agarwal, S Jain
03 November, 1999·1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner is aggrieved by the omission of the respondent No. 1 to dispose of the petitioner's application under Section 3A(4) of the Central Excise Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') and also of the attempt of the respon...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Abb Abl Limited And Others vs National Thermal Power ...
Judges: G Mathur, Y Singh
03 November, 1999·According to these conditions, interested persons could have obtained information brochure and the documents at the office of NTPC at NOIDA (U. P.) and were also required to submit these documents at the office of NTPC at NOIDA (U. P.). These documents in the present case were obtained at NOIDA and ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
J.S. Metals (P) Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Central Excise
Judges: M Agarwal, S Jain
03 November, 1999·1. In this petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India, the petitioner is aggrieved of the omission of respondent No. 1 to redetermine the actual production of excisable goods in petitioner's factory in terms of Section 3A(4) of Central Excise Act, 1944 and the insistence of the respondents ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Basant Lal vs District Pancyayat Raj Officer ...
Judges: R Zaidi
03 November, 1999·therefore, the same cannot be said to have been carried. 5. The present petition was directed to be put up along with W.P. No. 3015 (MS) of 1997 referred to above. It was on 23.3.1998 that the following order was passed by this Court after hearing counsel for the petitioner and learned standing coun...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sarada Steels Industries (P) Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Central Excise
Judges: M Agarwal, S Jain
03 November, 1999·2. We have heard Shri Pankaj Bhatia, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Shri Chandra Prakash, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 3. The petitioner is running a mill manufacturing hot re-rolled non-alloy steel and produces goods that are subject to excise duty. Section 3A of the Act em...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sarada Steels Industries (P) Ltd. vs Commissioner Of C. Ex.
Judges: M Agarwal, S Jain
03 November, 1999·2. We have heard Shri Pankaj Bhatia, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Shri Chandra Prakash, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 3. The petitioner is running a mill manufacturing hot re-rolled non alloy steel and produces goods that are subject to excise duty. Section 3A of the Act em...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Neeraj Jain And Others vs Mohd. Salim
Judges: R S Dhavan, A Chakrabarti
02 November, 1999·(b) the proceedings for contempt suffer from an infirmity that the Cantonment Board was an essential party and, thus, the proceedings must fail by virtue of sub-section (4) of Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. (c) the extension of an injunction order on which there was an allegation th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
M.R. Compound And Allied Products ... vs Cegat And Anr.
Judges: P Jain
02 November, 1999·3. It is not disputed that it is permissible for the High Court to review its order/judgment rendered under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The position has been settled by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in various decisions. The decisions in Shivdeo Singh and Ors. v. State of Punjab and Ors. A...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
A.K. Enterprises, Agra vs Sterling Machine Tolls And ...
Judges: I Quddusi
02 November, 1999·2. In Bodrilal Jodhraj & Sons v. Girdharilal and another, AIR 1988 (M) 24, it has been held that there is no subordination between the Additional District Judges and District Judges so as to empower the district Judge to exercise the revlsional powers under Section 115, C.P.C. In respect of the orde...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.