New India Assurance Co., Ltd., ... vs Sirtaj Bahadur Srivastava And ...
Judges: R Zaidi
20 April, 1999·5. On behalf of the claimant-respondents Sartaj Bahadur Srivastava. Ravindra Prasad Srivastava and Anoop Kumar Srivastava were produced as witnesses, who supported the case of the claimants, besides other documentary evidence. In rebuttal of the aforesaid evidence, no oral evidence was produced by t...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Naveen Chandra Gupta, Advocate vs Union Of India And Others
Judges: M Katju, R Singh
20 April, 1999·5. In our opinion, in view of this specific provision in the Constitution, the question whether any vote in the Lok Sabha was invalid or not is beyond the scope of judicial review. 6. In this connection, reference may be made to the book 'Constitutional and Administrative Law' by Hood Phillips in wh...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mahendra Singh vs Collector, Gorakhpur And Another
Judges: B K Roy, O Bhatt
20 April, 1999·2. The facts in dispute are in a narrow compass. After the passing of the order aforementioned holding the petitioner to be entitled to have uompensation to the tune of Rs. 12,600 from respondent No. 2 with a further direction to respondent No. 2 to pay the said amount within one month alongwith cos...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ashok Iron And Steel Mills vs Cegat
Judges: M Agarwal
20 April, 1999·4. The petitioner had set up a steel rolling mill and in pursuance of a scheme contained in Rule 96ZP framed under Section 3A of the Act, opted to pay Excise duty on the basis of the capacity of the works. The proviso to Sub-section (3) of Section 3A provides that where a factory producing notified ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Kalpana Gulati And Others vs Viiith Addl. District Judge, ...
Judges: Y Singh
20 April, 1999·POINTS FOR DETERMINATION 4. I have heard counsel for the parties, Sri Ravi Shankar Prasad argued the case with great ability for petitioners and Sri Rajesh Tandon appeared for the respondents. * Was the need bona fide? Was the hardship properly compared? * Was a notice under proviso to Section 21 (1...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sanjay Agarwal And Another vs Nagar Mahapalika, Allahabad And ...
Judges: R S Dhavan, V Goel
20 April, 1999·7. When this Court took up the hearing of this case this month, another complication was placed, as if to further frustrate the decision of the local administration of 4th November, 1986 to shift the vegetable vendors from its present site to the alternative site already selected and picked by the l...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Haridas (Decd) Through L.Rs. vs Collector, Mahoba And Others
Judges: R S Dhavan, V Goel
20 April, 1999·Project Manager (Lands) D.R.D.O., Chhikahara. District Mahoba Kindly refer to letter No. June 25, 1996 of this office which was concerning the above subject and was addressed to the S.D.M., Mahoba, copy of which has been endorsed to you which is in context of raising of boundary wall after acquisiti...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Chotti vs Xiiith Additional District ...
Judges: Y Singh
19 April, 1999·2. I have heard counsel for the parties. The counsel for the petitioner argued that 22.02.1996 was not the first date of hearing. The first date of hearing is the date on which the Court applies its mind and the Court applied its mind on 22.08.1997 the date when the Judgment was delivered and by tha...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jalaluddin vs Superintendent Of Police And Anr.
Judges: B K Roy, O Bhatt
19 April, 1999·He is a political and social worker. He was elected as the president of the Kairana Block Congress (I). In the year 1986 this History-sheet was opened against him on the ground that he was involved in Crime Case No. 5 of 1974, under Section 392, I.P.C. The aforesaid crime case gave rise to Crime Cas...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Munni Pathak And Others vs Director, Mahila And Bal Vikas ...
Judges: S Singh
19 April, 1999·2. Sri R. C. Singh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the notification is vitiated stemming from the reason that all the posts were sought to be filled by direct recruitment whereas according to Rule 4 of the Uttar Pradesh Child Development and Nutrition (Subordinate) Servi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.