Krishan Swaroop Gupta And Others vs Union Of India And Others
Judges: B Roy, R Mahajan
23 September, 1998·4. We may also point out that the Apex Court had on earlier occasion considered somewhat a similar order which was impugned before it in Joint Council of Bus Syndicate and others V. Union of India and others, AIR 1992 SC 2626 : 1992 Supp (2) SCC 125. It disposed of the cases with directions that on ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
U.P. State Sugar Corporation vs Ram Nain Singh And Ors.
Judges: B Roy, R Mahajan
23 September, 1998·And whereas, in order to enforce the said unanimous decision taken by the said Bipartite Committee the State Government exercising power under Clause (b) of Section 3 of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (U.P. Act XXVIII of 1947) issued order vide Notification No. 1867 (HI)/XXXVI-2-201 (HI)-79 ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Urmila Devi vs Pooran Chand Dabar And Others
Judges: B Dikshit, O Jain
23 September, 1998·3. On 1st of July, 1998, the defendants filed an application before Court below for recall of injunction order dated 28.4.1998 and by the Impugned order dated 18th August, 1998. the Court vacated order of injunction in exercise of power under Order XXXIX. Rule 4, C.P.C. Hence this appeal filed by th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Subhash Chand vs Collector, Etawah And Others
Judges: B Roy, R Mahajan
23 September, 1998·11. Now we would like to proceed with the language of Section 161 of the Act which is quoted with advantage : "Recovery of dues of (Kshettra Panchayats)--Any sum due to a (Kshettra Panchayat) under this Act or under any rule or bye-law made thereunder and declared by this Act or such rule or bye-law...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Shankar Lal Khandelwal vs Ivth Addl. District Judge, ...
Judges: S Narain
22 September, 1998·3. The petitioner contested the application. It was admitted by him that he is tenant of landlord-respondent No. 3. It was, however, denied that the need of landlord was bona fide. It has stated that he was living in house in Dempeer Nagar. His brother Rajendra Prasad is not residing in house situat...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Mehar Jahan vs J.S.C.C./Prescribed Authority, ...
Judges: J Gupta
22 September, 1998·4. Learned counsel for the petitioner argued before the Court that there was no provision either under the Act or in the Rules permitting the Prescribed Authority to review the order dated 11.10.91 and therefore, the impugned order dated 7.8.92 was without jurisdiction. This argument of the learned ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Yogi Pharmacy Ltd. vs Elegant Marbles And Grani ...
Judges: A Banerji
21 September, 1998·3. Though the present application was filed in Company Petition No. 2 of 1997, which has been filed under Section 433 ie) by M/s. Elegant Marbles and Grani Industries Limited, the applicant has impleaded nine parties to the present application as opposite parties 1 to 7 thereof are petitioner who ha...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Shashi Shah vs Kiran Kumar Shah
Judges: B Roy, R Mahajan
21 September, 1998·10. The Judge Family Court has believed that version of husband respondent and has found the cruelty by wife proved and the cruelty by husband not proved. The issue of desertion has been decided in favour of the husband. 11. It is very unfortunate that the judgment of the Judge Family Court is runni...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Dinesh Kumar Mishra Alias Hira ... vs Mirzapur Urban Co-Operative Bank ...
Judges: B Roy, J Mishra
21 September, 1998·1. Heard Sri H, N. Tripathi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner who has come up with a prayer to quash Bye-law No. 31 framed by the Mirzapur Urban Cooperative Bank Limited, Mirzapur. 2. Even though we proceeded to hear him for about twenty five minutes by now, he falls to show tha...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ugrasen Misra vs State Of U.P. And Others
Judges: G Mathur, R Nigam
21 September, 1998·3. Sri Viresh Misra, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that any offence under the Act is not cognizable in view of Section 5 of the Act and, therefore, the respondent No. 2 has got no authority to arrest the petitioner. He has further contended that the seizure of the Truck is wholly ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.