S.L. Bathla vs State Of Bank Of India And Ors.
Judges: D Seth
08 December, 1998·5. Mr. Agarwal, in reply had elaborated his arguments advanced by Mr. Verma with brilliant effort and had sought to contend that the decision of the Delhi High Court and the Apex Court in the earlier writ petition filled by the petitioner was confined to the question on fundamental right to contest ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Harish Chandra Singh vs State Of Uttar Pradesh And Ors.
Judges: S Phaujdar, S R Alam
07 December, 1998·3. The petitioner challenged the competence of the Governor to sanction prosecution in the instant case in the light of the proviso to Section 197(1), Cr.P.C. The provisions of Section 197(1), Cr.P.C. along with the proviso is quoted below : 197. Prosecution of Judges and public servants.- (1) When ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Reptakos Brett And Co. vs Labour Court (Vth), U.P., Kanpur ...
Judges: J Gupta
07 December, 1998·"(k) 'Industry' means any business, trade, undertaking, manufacture or calling of employers and includes any calling, service, employment, handicraft, or industrial occupation or avocation of workmen : Industrial dispute is defined in Section 2 (l) as under : (l) "Industrial Dispute' means any dispu...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
U.P. State Sugar Corporation ... vs Ambika Singh And Another
Judges: R Trivedi
04 December, 1998·8. I have carefully considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties. Clause LL of the Standing Orders contains provisions for retirement of workmen reaching the age of superannuation. As clause LL is relevant, for convenience and ready reference, sub-clauses (1) to (6) are being re...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Maharia Re-Surfacing And ... vs Greater Noida Industrial ...
Judges: M Katju, S Saraf
03 December, 1998·2. The petitioner is a public limited company. The respondent No. 2 issued an advertisement on behalf of respondent No. 1 which was published in the newspaper 'Indian Express' on 24.4.1997 for inviting tenders for a contract whose approximate costs was rupees 5.15 crores. In pursuance of the said ad...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Daya Ram Singh vs Deputy Director Of ...
Judges: S P Srivastava
03 December, 1998·4. Counter-affidavit has been filed in this case. In the counter-affidavit the contesting respondent has submitted that actually the order passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation on 9.4.1973 was a final order. It is stated that there was neither any restoration nor any order was passed on 20....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Dharmawati Tewari And Others vs Prem Shanker Tewari And Others
Judges: R Zaidi
02 December, 1998·4. Suit was contested by the defendant Nos. 1, 7, 8 and 9, who have filed their written statements denying the claim of the plaintiffs respondents. It was pleaded that the house in dispute was not the joint family property. It was acquired by Devi Shanker. out of his personal funds by means of a reg...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Amita Arya And Others vs Additional District Judge Xith, ...
Judges: J Gupta
02 December, 1998·3. With the consent of parties' counsel and in the circumstances of the case, this writ petition is disposed of finally at the admission stage itself. 4. This is tenant's writ petition challenging the orders dated 23.1.1998 passed by respondent No. 2 and the order dated 16.11.1998 passed by responde...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Vineet Kumar vs Neel Hans Garg
Judges: J Mishra
02 December, 1998·2. It is not disputed that the revisionist was tenant of the premises in suit on a monthly rent of Rs. 2,100. Since the rent payable was more than Rs. 2,000. there was no applicability of U. P. Act No. 13 of 1972. 3. The defendant contested the suit inter alia, on the ground that the plaintiff was o...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kanhaiya Prasad vs Assistant Collector, First ...
Judges: B Roy, R Singh
01 December, 1998·The Submissions : 3. Sri W.H. Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner contended as follows : (i) Under Section 47A of the Act, penalty could not be imposed as held by a three Judges Special Bench of the Court in Girijesh Kumar Srivastava v. State of U. P., 1984 ALJ 1604. (ii) Once the petitioner di...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.