Shital Kumar Vaish vs State Of U.P. And Others
Judges: S Verma, D K Trivedi
15 July, 1997·11. In the claim petition, the petitioner had claimed that he was appointed on deputation with the Ramganga Command Project in view of the Government Order dated 13.6.1977 and was entitled for all the benefits in fixation of pay after giving due benefit to the tenure of service rendered with the Kan...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Meeta Harijan And Ors. vs State Of Uttar Pradesh
Judges: A Gupta, R Ray
14 July, 1997·2. Accused appellants Meeta Harijan and accused Dukharan Harijan has been charged under Section 302, IPC, while other accused persons have been charged under Section 302, I.P.C. read with Section 34, I.P.C. for committing the murder of Parsadhu son of Ramdas at about 1.30 a.m. on the night between 1...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Dhani Prasad vs Excise Commissioner, Allahabad ...
Judges: G Mathur, B Chauhan
14 July, 1997·1. This petition has been filed for quashing the proceedings initiated against the petitioner to recover the dues of the excise department. 2. Paras Nath Dubey and Rama Kant Pandey, respondent Nos. 5 and 6 were granted licence in Form FL 5 and the right to vend foreign liquor at Laldarwaja in the ci...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Suleman Khan And Another vs Basic Shiksha Parishad, ...
Judges: R Zaidi
14 July, 1997·2. In all these petitions, the question regarding the determination of seniority of the teachers serving in the Basic Schools run by the Basic Shiksha Parishad. Uttar Pradesh is involved. 3. It appears that claim petitions were decided by the U. P. Public Service Tribunal vide its order dated 10.12....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Hi-Tech Gears Ltd. vs Yogi Pharmacy Ltd. And Ors.
Judges: A Banerji
14 July, 1997·4. I have heard Sri R. P. Goel and Sri Manish Goel, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri P. M. Gupta, learned counsel for the respondent-company, on the question whether the petition should be admitted and advertised. It is noteworthy that the respondent-company has not denied the fact that it...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kailash Raj vs Basic Shiksha Parishad, ...
Judges: D Seth
14 July, 1997·1. The petitioner was suspended by an order dated 25.11.1993, Annexure-3 to the writ petition, on the ground that the charge-sheet has been filed against the petitioner in connection with a case pending before the learned District and Sessions Judge. Saharanpur pursuant to an enquiry by the U. P. Vi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mandi Samiti, Through Its ... vs Mandi Samiti And Anr.
Judges: K Bhargava, B Singh, J Bhalla
14 July, 1997·4. Shri Ramchandra Nath, the opposite party in review petition has appeared en notice issued to him. He has filed an objection to the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. He has supported it by an affidavit. In the affidavit emphasis has been laid on the fact that no cogent reasons for...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti vs Bipin Kumar And Another
Judges: R Ray
14 July, 1997·2. Appeal No. 117 of 1995 is taken up for hearing along with the bunch of other aforesaid first appeals. 3. The lands acquired in respect of these appeals are more or less of same type of land and adjacent to each other and the lands were acquired by notification under Sections 4 and 6 of the Land A...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Gurdayal Saran Prasad vs District Judge, Dehradun And ...
Judges: J Gupta
13 July, 1997·4. The only point for consideration in this writ petition is whether the notice under Section 106, Transfer of Property Act served by the petitioner on the respondents was a valid notice. The revisional court has taken the view that since it was admitted to the petitioner-landlord himself that durin...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Leela vs Smt. Mukanda And Others
Judges: A Banerji
11 July, 1997·7. It was firstly contended on behalf of the appellant that the due execution of the deed of agreement of sale has not been proved. The learned counsel urged that out of the two attesting witnesses, one was alive and consequently, the plaintiff ought to have examined the said witness for proving exe...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.