Basant Kumar vs University Of Allahabad And ...
Judges: R Mehrotra
16 February, 1995·12. Section-29 of U. P. State University Act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) provides for constitution of Examination Committee and its powers. For convenience, Sec. 29 of the Act is being reproduced : "29 Examinations Committee:-- (1) There shall be an Examinations Committee in the Unive...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Intezar Ahmad And Another vs Jumman And Others
Judges: D Sinha
15 February, 1995·1. Heard Sri Rajiv Joshi, learned counsel appearing for the defendant-applicants and Sri Pushkar Mehrotra, holding brief of Sri R. K. Jain, learned counsel appearing for the plaintiff-opposite parties. 2. In Original Suit No. 65 of 1982 between Jumman and others and Smt. Raisa Khatun and others, pen...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
U.P. State Industrial ... vs Umrao And Others
Judges: S Mohapatra, V Goel
15 February, 1995·4. Mr. Tewari, Senior Advocate for the appellant assisted by Mr. Pradeep Kumar Gupta and Mr. Rakesh Tewari, Advocates submitted that in view of series of the pronouncement of the Supreme Court notice ought to have been given to the Development Corporation for participating in the enquiry. Absence of...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mirza, Son Of Laloo And Ors. vs State Of Uttar Pradesh
Judges: R Mehrotra, S Faujdar
14 February, 1995·9. The prosecution in order to prove its case examined PW-1 Ram Satan, PW-2 Sathu, PW-3 Thakurdayal, PW-4 Rajendra Prasad Raj and Police Constable Virendra Nath Rai, PW-5, Mohammad Jafri PW-6, Vishvambhar Bind, PW-7, Investigating Officer Sri Aditya Giri, Sub-Inspector PW-8, Dr. Tej Bahadur PW-9, Ra...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Khacher Singh vs State Of Uttar Pradesh And Others
Judges: R Sharma, D Seth
14 February, 1995·3. This writ petition is to be dismissed for two reasons, namely, (i) petitioner is guilty of concealment of relevant facts; and (ii) his earlier writ petition (Writ Petition No. 8891 of 1983) against the same notifications, which have been impugned in the instant case, having been dismissed on 17-7...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Parle International Ltd. vs Union Of India (Uoi)
Judges: O Prakash, J Sidhu
14 February, 1995·1. The short submission of learned counsel for petitioners is that the petitioners had completed inspection of record on 18-1-1995 having obtained extension of fifteen days from the respondents and thereafter the petitioners intended to file reply within fifteen days. But the Collector of Customs & ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jagdish Prasad vs Ivth Addl. Sessions Judge And Ors.
Judges: K Sharma
13 February, 1995·"126..... (2) All evidence in such proceedings shall be taken in the presence of the person against whom an order for payment of maintenance is proposed to be made, or, when his personal attendance is dispensed with, in the presence of his pleader, and shall be recorded in the manner prescribed for ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Lokendra (In Jail) vs State Of U.P.
Judges: G Tripathi
13 February, 1995·"You are hereby required to receive the said accused (Lokendra Singh) into your custody and produce him before the said Court as required on the reverse." This order has been signed by Magan Narain Kulshrestha, District and Sessions Judge, Bijnor. It bears the seal of the Court also. But unfortunate...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Alloy Steel Forgings (P) Ltd. vs Asstt. Collector, C. Ex.
Judges: O Prakash, S Dikshit
10 February, 1995·1. The short contention of the petitioner is that against the order of the Adjudicating Authority dated 30th August, 1994, the petitioner filed an appeal alongwith the stay application on 24-9-1994 which was heard on 1st November, 1994 but the stay application has not yet been disposed of by the app...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rama Shanker Dixit, Son Of Sheo ... vs The Viith Additional District ...
Judges: M Katju
09 February, 1995·2. I have Shri P. N. Khare learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Raj Kumar for Respondents. 3. Since there are no disputed questions of fact it is not necessary to call for a counter-affidavit. Hence I am disposing of this writ petition finally at this stage. 4. The respondent No. 2 is owner o...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.