U.P. State Electricity Board, ... vs M/S. Om Metals And Minerals (Pvt.) ...
Judges: S Sahay, M S Dikshit
20 May, 1994·The Engineer acting on the written orders of his immediate superior, may at any time by notice in writing to the contractor either stop the work altogether or reduce or cut it down. If the work is stopped altogether, the contractor will only be paid for work done and expenses legitimately incurred b...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Executive Engineer, Iind ... vs Presiding Officer, Labour Court ...
Judges: S Keshote
20 May, 1994·4. So both of the workmen, respondent No. 2 in these two writ petitions, were engaged on daily wages by the petitioner No. 1 in the same scheme and their services have to end on March 31, 1982. The workmen raised an industrial dispute alleging that their services were illegally terminated by petitio...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
U.P. State Sugar Corporation Ltd. vs Labour Court And Ors.
Judges: S Keshote
20 May, 1994·11. Let a copy of this award be sent to the State Government for information and necessary action." 3. The award dated November 28, 1980 has partly been complied with by the petitioner. The respondent Nos. 2 to 13 have been paid retaining allowance admissible to their category for off season 1974-75...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sujana Ram vs Authority Under Payment Of Wages ...
Judges: S Keshote
20 May, 1994·2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that the Authority under the Act 1936 has committed a serious illegality in exercise of its jurisdiction in rejecting the application of the petitioner as sufficient cause has been made out for filing of the application after limitation. Next, he has ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Syed Nizam And Others vs First Additional Civil Judge, ...
Judges: I Mathur
19 May, 1994·4. Some of the opposite parties have filed a counter affidavit. It is alleged that the petitioners had filed an earlier writ petition, being Writ Petition No. 2781 (MS) of 1993, with the same relief. But it was dismissed as not pressed and, as such, this writ petition is not maintainable. Further de...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
The Indian Wood Products Company ... vs Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti And ...
Judges: O Prakash, S Mohapatra
17 May, 1994·17. "A Committee shall, for the purpose of this Act, have the power to- (i).... (ii).... (iii) levy and collect: (a).... (b) market fee, which shall be payable on transactions of sale of specified agricultural produce in the market area at such rates.......... and such fee shall be realised in the f...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Allahabad District Co-Operative ... vs Lalji Srivastava
Judges: S Sodhi, R Sharma
17 May, 1994·"24(ii) If before coming into operation of these regulations, the society had entered into any contract with an employee on the date of his employment whereby he is entitled to continue beyond 58 years, the rule of retirement at the age of 58 years as contained in Clause(i) shall not apply and the a...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
M/S. Umesh Industries And Another vs Ix Additional District Judge, ...
Judges: A Srivastava
16 May, 1994·3. In the suit filed against the petitioner besides ejectment was claimed a sum of Rs. 4801.40 as arrears of rent upto 28-6-1990 and damages @ Rs. 2000/- per month for the period 29-6-1990 onwards. The rate of rent was alleged to be Rs. 665/- per month upto 31-3-1990 and Rs.730/- per month from 1-4-...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Lallan Roi vs Presiding Officer, Labour Court ...
Judges: P Mukherjee
13 May, 1994·"6-N. Conditions precedent to retrenchment of workmen - No workman employed in any industry who has been in continuous service for not less than one year under an employer shall be retrenched by that employer until: (a) the workman has been given one month's notice in writing indicating the reason f...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jokhu Lal vs Superintendent, Central Jail And ...
Judges: G Mathur, S Phaujdar
13 May, 1994·5. Sri D.S. Misra, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there has been an inordinate delay in consideration of the representation made by the detenu and as such his continued detention is illegal. In order to appreciate the contention of the learned counsel, it will be convenient to...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.