Km. Divya Chandra vs The Vice-Chancellor, Roorkee ...
Judges: M Bhat
17 February, 1992·17. The position which at present emerges is that the petitioner's result for the examination which she has taken under the orders of the Court is not announced. Her result of 3rd Semester is withheld under the orders of the Vice-Chancellor on the basis of the recommendations of the Enquiry Committe...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Collector, Varanasi vs Rai Prem Chand And Others
Judges: N Mithal, D Sinha
14 February, 1992·6. Thus, so far as proceedings initiated in the court on a reference under S. 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 are concerned these are to be governed by the Code. The proceedings under S. 18 are to be taken in the Court and the nature of these proceedings is that of a suit to which the code has ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Badrul Hasan Qadiri vs State Of Uttar Pradesh And Others
Judges: A Verma, R Gulati
12 February, 1992·has been the subject of numberous pronouncements of the Supreme Court, but it is not necessary to burden this judgment with all those decisions. We will refer only to the barest minimum.-In S. Azeez Basha v. Union of India reported in AIR 1968 SC 662, Chief Justice Wanchoo speaking for the Constitut...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bhatia Minerals vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax And ...
Judges: A Verma, M Katju
12 February, 1992·2. The petitioner in Writ Petition No. 1330 of 1991 is a partnership firm carrying on the business of carriage, contract and transport. It received a notice dated December 26, 1990, from the office of the Commissioner of Income-tax, Meerut, requiring it to show cause as to why the jurisdiction of th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Seth Banarsi Dass Gupta (Huf) vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Judges: A Varma, M Katju
11 February, 1992·3. At the time of settlement proceedings before the Department, however, Sri Banarsi Dass Gupta filed a disclosure petition in which he stated that he had received from Sheo Prasad not only Rs. 25 lakhs in cash but also Rs. 7.75 lakhs cash over and above this. In short, it was explained that the tot...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Indo-Gulf Fertilizers And ... vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Anr.
Judges: B Kumar, S Dikshit
11 February, 1992·Explanation.--For the purposes of this Sub-section, tax payable on such excess amount means,-- (i) in any case where the amount of adjustments made under the first proviso to Clause (a) of Sub-section (1) exceed the total income, the tax that would have been chargeable had the amount of the adjustme...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sah Machine Tools Pvt. Ltd. vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors.
Judges: A Singh, S Verma
10 February, 1992·ORDER 1. We have heard Shri A.P. Mathur learned Counsel for the petitioner and Shri Sushil Hartauli learned Additional Standing Counsel appearing for the Union of India. The petitioner is aggrieved by an order dated 17.1.1992 passed by the Collector (Appeals) Central Excise Allahabad. The petitioner...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kailash Nath Singh Yadav vs Speaker, Vidhan Sabha, Lucknow ...
Judges: S Sahay, D Trivedi
10 February, 1992·4. From a perusal of the impunged order, it will appear that it is in three parts. The first part is with regard to the finding recorded by respondent No. 1 thata there are two groups in the Janta Dal Legislative Party as a result of a division in the party which had taken place before 25th November...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sudershan Doors Pvt. Ltd. And Anr. vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors.
Judges: A Singh, S Verma
10 February, 1992·JUDGMENT Anshuman Singh, J. 1. We have heared learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Standing Counsel appearing for the Union of India. The grievance of the petitioner in the present writ petition is that though he has filed an appeal before the Appellate Collector Central Exc...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Surendra Rao vs Regional Trasport Authority, ...
Judges: V Khanna, R Sharma
10 February, 1992·4. That Act provides for liberal grant of permits and excluded the participation of existing operators in the proceedings pertain-ing to grant of permits. In view of the provisions of the Act an existing operator can neither oppose the grant of permits on the ground that his rights under Arts. 14 an...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.