Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 1992
  6. /
  7. January

Sah Machine Tools Pvt. Ltd. vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors.

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|10 February, 1992

JUDGMENT / ORDER

ORDER
1. We have heard Shri A.P. Mathur learned Counsel for the petitioner and Shri Sushil Hartauli learned Additional Standing Counsel appearing for the Union of India. The petitioner is aggrieved by an order dated 17.1.1992 passed by the Collector (Appeals) Central Excise Allahabad. The petitioner has statutory right of filing an appeal under Section 35B of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 to the Customs Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal.
2. After hearing learned Counsel for the parties and in view of the alternative remedy available to the petitioner, we are not inclined to interfere under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petition is accordingly rejected. In case the petitioner files an application for stay along with the appeal, the Appellate Tribunal is directed to dispose of the stay application within a period of 15 days from the date of presentation of the same.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sah Machine Tools Pvt. Ltd. vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors.

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
10 February, 1992
Judges
  • A Singh
  • S Verma