Nadir Husain vs Regional Transport Officer, ...
Judges: S Dhaon, S Sahay
17 May, 1989·3. There is no dispute that the petitioner can get a temporary permit on the notified portion of the route only if the conditions laid down in the proviso to S. 68-FF are in existence. Under the proviso the Regional Transport Authority or the State Transport Authority, as the case may be, alone and ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rakesh Singhal And Another vs Vth Addl. Distt. And Sessions ...
Judges: M Singh
16 May, 1989·6. After the notices were issued to the defendants, they filed an objection. It was stated that the plaintiffs obtained the interim order by concealment of material facts. The passage is a public path-way of 12 feet in width, on which, the plaintiff has constructed the wall under the protection of i...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Nathaniel Masih vs U.P. Scheduled Caste Finance And ...
Judges: U Srivastava, S Raza
16 May, 1989·4. So far as the question of delay is concerned, the termination order was passed on March 17, 1982 and the writ petition was preferred by the petitioner on November 14, 1983. It appears that the writ petition was admitted. It seems that the Bench condoned the delay and that is why the writ petition...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad ... vs Commissioner Of Sales Tax
Judges: A Singh
10 May, 1989·3. I have heard Sri V.M. Sahai, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Revenue and Sri Bharatji Agarwal, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the assessee. 4. The sole question which requires consideration in these two revisions is as to whether the cement and steel supplied by the assessee to...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rajendra Kumar vs Regional Office, Madhyamik ...
Judges: S Agarwala, H Mittal
10 May, 1989·1. The petitioner appeared in the Intermediate Examination of 1987 conducted by the Board of High School and Intermediate Education, Regional Office, Bareilly. He was allotted Roll No. 137715. He appeared in the said examination. He was not caught using unfair means, but his result has been cancelle...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Peacock Chemicals (P.) Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax And ...
Judges: R Sahai, R Singh
10 May, 1989·1. The short question of law is whether the order of transfer passed under Section 126 of the Income-tax Act suffers from any error of law. 2. The petitioner is a private limited company. It is registered under the Companies Act. Its head office is situated at 8/7, Industrial Area Site No. 4, Sahiba...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Bilas Dwivedi And Ors. vs State Of U.P. And Anr.
Judges: B Yadav
10 May, 1989·5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, principal question that falls for determination is as to whether under the circumstances of the case, accused applicants could get fair and impartial trial in the Court of Sri Nepal Singh, Special Judge Saharanpur. 6. The relevant statutory provisions...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Western India Match Co. Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Sales Tax
Judges: A Singh
08 May, 1989·3. It would be relevant here to refer to the provisions of Section 15-A(1)(a) of the Act which reads as under : "has, without reasonable cause failed to furnish the return of his turnover or to furnish it within the time allowed and in the manner prescribed, or to deposit the tax due under this Act,...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Vivek Kumar Vyas vs Harcourt Butler Technological ...
Judges: S Dhaon, H Mital
05 May, 1989·"All nomination papers must be sent by the sponsoring authority by registered post in double sealed envelopes and addressed to the Director, Harcourt Butler Technological Institute, Kanpur. Nomination paper and other documents sent through special messenger (including the candidate who has been spon...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Satya Prakash And Anr. vs Rajendra Prasad And Ors.
Judges: A Dikshita
04 May, 1989·1. This revision has been directed against the order dated 28-10-1988 passed by 1st Additional Civil Judge, Farrukhabad by which an application under Order 6, Rule 17, C.P.C. filed by the applicants has been allowed. 2. Heard counsel for the parties. 3. Palpably the revision is so ill-merited that i...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.