Bhuwal vs Deputy Director Of ...
Judges: Y Nandan, R Misra, H Seth, S Malik, T Misra
31 January, 1977·4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and examining the decisions cited before us, we are of the opinion that there is no force in the contentions advanced by Sri S. P. Gupta. 5. As a result of paragraph 3 of the Order, as from the 26th July, 1948, the then High Court at Allahabad and the ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Geep Flashlight Industries Ltd. vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors.
Judges: D Chandrashekhar, R Sahai
31 January, 1977·4. Sub-Section (1) of Section 3 of the Act provides, inter alia, that duties of Excise shall be levied and collected on all excisable goods produced or manufactured in India in such manner as may be prescribed and at the rates set forth in the First Schedule to the Act. Sub-section (2) of Section 3 ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohan Meakin Brerweies Ltd. & Anr. vs State Of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
Judges:
31 January, 1977·(b) .............................. has been paid or a bond has been executed for the payment thereof." Sub-S. (1) of S. 28 of the Act reads : "28. Duty on excisable articles. - (1) An excise duty or a countervailing duty as the case may be, at such rate or rates as the Local Government shall direct,...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
M/S. Ram Prakash & Sons And Anr. vs Sales Tax Officer.
Judges:
28 January, 1977·4. The provisions of the Act were modified substantially by the Amending Act, U.P. Act No. 24 of 1971, which came into force on 22-8-1971. This Act substituted two new sections for S. 3 and S. 33-A of the Act. The relevant portions of these two new sections read as follows :- "3 Liability to tax und...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sardar Balbir Singh vs Atma Ram Srivastava
Judges: H Swarup, M Mehrotra
27 January, 1977·3. The application was directed to he listed before Division Bench by the Hon'ble the Chief Justice. A preliminary objection has been raised to the consideration of this application by the Division Bench on the ground that the opinion sought to be 'reviewed, corrected and amended' was given by a Ful...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sidh Nath Shukla And Ors. vs Smt. Roop Rani And Ors.
Judges: M Mehrotra
18 January, 1977·6. Feeling aggrieved, the first set of the defendants, namely. Smt. Roop Rani, Bal Kishan and Budh Sen, filed an appeal in the lower appellate court and the same was allowed. The lower appellate court held that the plaintiffs had failed to prove that the disputed pieces of land formed part of any co...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohd. Mustafa vs Mansoor And Ors.
Judges: M Mehrotra
18 January, 1977·(3) Even if all the five defendants were joint tenants, still, there was no division of tenanted accommodation inter se and all of them were jointly in occupation and hence the decree passed against some of them was binding on all. Reliance was placed on (i) Gool Rustomji v. Jal Rustomji (AIR 1972 B...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Additional Commissioner Of ... vs Channoo Lal Damodar Dass
Judges: S Chandra, B Sapru
17 January, 1977·2. The assessee carries on the business of commission agency. It charged dharmada at the rate of one anna per 100 rupees, mandir charges at the rate of 1/2 old paisa per bag and gaushala at the rate of 2 old paise per 100 rupees from all its constituents to whom the goods were sold. The assessee cla...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Surya Mani Tewari vs State Of U.P.
Judges: K Agarwal
10 January, 1977·3. Admittedly, in the instant case the applicant was not given an opportunity of hearing on the question of sentence in accordance with the procedure prescribed by this Section before the same was passed upon him by the Magistrate, Sri V.P. Goyal, learned State Counsel, however, controverted the abo...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Syed Mohd. Idris vs 1St Additional District Judge And ...
Judges: D Jha
06 January, 1977·3. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties at some length and perused the various material brought on the record of this Court. The learned counsel for the petitioner has raised three questions for the decision of this court. Firstly that the permission granted under Section 3 of the old U....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.