Ganga Bakhsh Singh And Ors. vs Madho Singh And Ors.
Judges: Malik, Kidwai, Beg, Mukerji, H Chaturvedi, Mehrotra, Sahai
22 December, 1954·9. Difficulty, however, arises in a case where a widow makes a gift of a part of the estate, not for any religious or charitable purpose which might be conducive to the well being of the soul of the deceased husband and the transfer is supported only on the ground that the next body of presumptive r...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Om Prakash vs Sm. Tahera Begam And Ors.
Judges: R Dayal, Asthana
22 December, 1954·2. Learned counsel for the appellant refers us to Order 21, Rule 11 (2) Clause (f) which provides that every application for execution of a decree will state whether any, and (if any) what, previous applications have been made for the execution of the decree, the, dates of such applications and thei...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Azmat Ullah And Ors. vs The Custodian, Evacuee Property, ...
Judges: Mootham, Agarwala, V Bhargava, M Chaturvedi, Mulla
21 December, 1954·3. The petitioners thereupon filed a petition in this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution. The -only person made the respondent to the petition was "The Custodian, Evacuee Property, U. P., Luck-now", and the prayer was that a "Writ, direction or order of the nature of 'mandamus', prohibition...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Deota Din vs Gur Prasad And Anr.
Judges: Malik, Kidwai, Beg, Mukerji, H Chaturvedi, Mehrotra, Sahai
20 December, 1954·8. Another point was raised that in the preemption suit no mention was made of any share in the residential house, and the defendants could not, therefore, claim that they had acquired any share in the residential house by pre-emption. The lower appellate Court, however, held that the plaintiff must...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mahabir Prasad Niranjanlal vs Commr. Of Income-Tax, U.P. And ...
Judges: Malik, Mootham, V Bhargava
17 December, 1954·"1. (a) Whether an order passed by an Appellate Assistant Commissioner refusing to admit an appeal by holding that it was not presented within time is an order under Section 30, Clause (2), of the Income-tax Act or under Section 31 of the Act? (b) Whether an appeal is competent to the Tribunal from ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Pramesh Chandra Gupta And Ors. vs The Registrar, High Court Of ...
Judges: Malik, Agarwala, Sahai
17 December, 1954·Under Section 9, the Bar Council was, with the previous sanction of the High Court, empowered to make rules to regulate the admission of persons as Advocates of the High Court, but there was a proviso to this to the effect that such rules shall not limit or in any' way affect the power of the High C...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kunjlal Nawal Bihari vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax, ...
Judges: Malik, Mootham, V Bhargava
17 December, 1954·In the Excess Profits Tax appeal, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner however, said: "The profit of the business as computed for income-tax purposes before deduction of E. P. T. and adopted for E. p. T. assessment includes the profit earned by the firm Kunjlal Banwarilal. It should be deducted and ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Juggilal Kamlapat Cotton ... vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax, U. P. ...
Judges:
17 December, 1954·4. Whether the assessable income of the applicant company for the purpose of section 23A is the income disclosed by the books of account of the applicant, viz., Rs. 42,510, or it is the amount determined to be the income by the Income-tax Officer for the purpose of the assessment to income-tax, viz....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
The Bhopal Trading Co., Kanpur vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax, U. P.
Judges:
17 December, 1954·(ii) Whether there is any evidence on record for the finding that the control and management of the firm vested in the hands of the partners residing in British India or that it was exercised from British India ? (iii) Whether there was any evidence on the record for the finding that the firm had in...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
B. Ratan Chand vs Mst. Kalawati
Judges: Gurtu
16 December, 1954·5. The husband has preferred this appeal. It is contended on his behalf that the wife was not entitled to separate residence or maintenance under the Hindu law merely on the ground of remarriage of the husband. 6. On behalf of the husband, reliance is placed on Mulla's Principles of Hindu Law, 11th ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.