Home Page

Judgments

High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad

Allahabad High Court is one of the oldest and most respected High Courts in India. It was established in 1866 and has been serving as a pillar of the Indian judiciary for over a century and a half. The court has a rich history and has witnessed some of the most significant legal battles in the country.

Allahabad High Court Judgements

The Allahabad High Court was initially established as the High Court of Judicature for the North-Western Provinces in 1866, and its jurisdiction extended over the provinces of Agra and Oudh. The court was renamed the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in 1919 and has been functioning under this name ever since. The court was later reconstituted after independence in 1947, and its jurisdiction now covers the entire state of Uttar Pradesh.

Over the years, the Allahabad High Court has produced many notable judges and lawyers who have contributed significantly to the legal profession in India. The court has also played a vital role in shaping the legal landscape of the country, having presided over some of the most significant cases in Indian legal history.

Today, the Allahabad High Court has a strength of 160 judges and is known for its efficient and expeditious disposal of cases. The court has an excellent reputation for upholding the rule of law and ensuring that justice is served promptly.

Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court is located in Allahabad, a city in the northern Indian state of Uttar Pradesh. The court complex is situated on a sprawling campus covering an area of over 73 acres. The campus comprises several buildings, including the main court building, the administrative block, and the advocate chambers.

The court is easily accessible from different parts of the city and is well connected to the rest of the country through various modes of transport. The nearest airport is the Allahabad airport, which is located approximately 12 km from the court. The city is also well connected by rail and road, making it easy for litigants and lawyers to travel to the court.

Location of Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court is one of the largest High Courts in India, with jurisdiction over the entire state of Uttar Pradesh. The court has original, appellate, and writ jurisdiction, which means that it can hear cases both in the first instance and on appeal. The court also has the power to issue writs, including writs of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto, and certiorari.

The Allahabad High Court has several benches located in different parts of the state, including Lucknow, Varanasi, and Agra. These benches hear cases that are assigned to them by the chief justice of the Allahabad High Court. The establishment of these benches has helped to improve access to justice for litigants living in different parts of the state.

Allahabad High Court Jurisdiction

The Allahabad High Court has delivered several landmark judgments over the years, some of which have had far-reaching implications for the country. One such Allahabad High Court Judgement is the Ayodhya verdict, which was delivered by a five-judge bench of the Allahabad High Court in 2010. The Allahabad High Court Judgement divided the disputed site into three parts, with one-third going to the Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, one-third to the Sunni Waqf Board, and one-third to the Nirmohi Akhara.

Another significant Allahabad High Court Judgement is the Imrana case, which dealt with the issue of marital rape. The court held that sexual intercourse between a man and his wife without her consent could be considered rape under certain circumstances.

The Allahabad High Court has also played a vital role in protecting the rights of marginalised communities in the country. In the Narayan Swamy case, the court held that a person cannot be denied a government job on the grounds of their sexual orientation. In the Indra Sawhney case, the court upheld the constitutional validity of reservations for socially and economically backward classes.

The Allahabad High Court has delivered several landmark judgments over the years, setting legal precedents that have had a profound impact on Indian society. One such Allahabad High Court judgement order was in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid title dispute, where the court ordered the disputed site to be divided into three parts between the Sunni Waqf Board, the Nirmohi Akhara and the deity Ram Lalla. Another notable Allahabad High Court judgement order was in the case of The Ruling On Triple Talaq, where in 2017, Justice Suneet Kumar presiding over a single-judge bench of the Allahabad High Court passed a landmark judgement declaring the practice of Triple Talaq unconstitutional. The judge noted that the practice was not only cruel but also demeaning.

Allahabad High Court Decisions/Judgments (Landmark Judgments)

The Allahabad High Court has an efficient case status system that enables litigants and lawyers to keep track of their cases. The court's website provides a comprehensive list of pending cases, along with their status and next hearing dates. Litigants can also access their case details by entering their case number or party name on the website.

In addition to the online system, the court has a well-established case management system that ensures timely disposal of cases. The court has set up special benches to deal with certain categories of cases, such as criminal appeals, public interest litigation, and service matters. These benches help to expedite the hearing of cases and reduce the backlog of pending cases.

The Allahabad High Court case status can be easily checked through the official website of the court. The website provides a user-friendly interface where one can search for the status of a case by either the case number or the party name. The Allahabad High Court case status provides information on the date of the next hearing, the stage of the case, and any orders passed by the court. Keeping track of the Allahabad High Court case status is essential for litigants and lawyers as it helps them to prepare for the next hearing and ensures timely submission of documents and arguments in court.

Allahabad High Court Case Status

The Allahabad High Court is one of the largest High Courts in India, with a sanctioned strength of 160 judges. However, as of May 2023, the court has only 103 judges, leaving a large number of vacancies. This shortage of judges has resulted in a massive backlog of cases, with some cases pending for years.

The Allahabad High Court has been facing a shortage of judges for several years. In 2016, the Supreme Court had directed the Uttar Pradesh government to fill up all vacancies in the court within six months, but the government failed to comply with the order. This shortage of judges has resulted in delays in the hearing of cases and has led to a lack of confidence in the judiciary among the people.

Number of Judges Present in the Allahabad High Court

Allahabad High Court Judges Appointment Procedure

Former Chief Justices of Allahabad High Court

Stay informed with the latest Allahabad High Court judgments and orders. Access authoritative legal decisions from the esteemed High Court of Judicature at Allahabad.

Allahabad High Court Judgments | HC Allahabad Orders

Stay informed on verdicts and rulings from the Allahabad High Court. Here is a collection of judgments pronounced by the Allahabad High Court. Suitable for lawyers, law students, and anyone interested in the justice system, we delve into complex legal issues and bring you the latest developments. Join us to view and download Allahabad High Court Judgements.

As per learned counsel for the petitioner the petitioner was duly selected for the post of 'Sahayak Ganak' and after completing successfully the period of probation was promoted to continue on the post in question since 19.9.2015. Sri Sharma has submitted that the Managing Director of the Federation has preferred a letter dated 29.7.2020 to the Additional Chief Secretary, Cooperative seeking clarification of the Government Order dated 18.3.2020 and again preferred a reminder on 1.12.2020 to the 

In view of above, the order of rejection of bail passed by the court below dated 8.8.2022 is, hereby, set aside. Having considered the submissions of the parties noted above, finding force in the submissions made by the learned counsel for the appellant; keeping in view uncertainty regarding conclusion of trial; one sided investigation by police, ignoring the case of accused side; applicant being under-trial having fundamental right to speedy; larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution

On the other hand, Sri Rajesh Kumar Singh learned AGA-I has opposed the bail and submitted that the bail prayer of the applicant be rejected as he is absconder. Considering the over all facts and circumstances of the case, the fact that the applicant was already granted bail and now, he has given undertaking that he will not seek adjournment and will cooperate in trial, therefore, it is a fit case for bail. Let the applicant Mishri Lal be released on bail in the above case crime number on his fu

Photocopy of the bail order of co-accused Ehtesham Ali @ Khursheed provided by the learned counsel for the applicant is taken on record. Shri Bhanu Pratap Singh, learned A.G.A. opposes the prayer for grant of bail to the applicant, but fairly concedes that similarly situated co-accused Ehtesham Ali @ Khursheed has already been granted bail. Considering the rival submissions of learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A., ground of parity with the co-accused and going through the material a

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having perused the record and keeping in view all the facts and circumstances of the case and also the admitted facts that the charge sheet has been filed after investigation and for those offences which are punishable with up to seven years' of imprisonment, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in 'Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and others' : (2021) 10 SCC 773 and in 'Aman Preet Singh Vs. C.B.I. through Director' : 2021 SCC OnLine 

It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that in three criminal cases bearing (i) Case Crime No.235 of 2022, under Sections 411, 413 I.P.C., Police Station Atariya, District Sitapur (ii) Case Crime No.325 of 2022, under Sections 379, 411, 413 I.P.C., Police Station Kamlapur, District Sitapur and (iii) Case Crime No.255 of 2022, under Sections 399, 402, 411, 413 I.P.C., Police Station Atariya, District Sitapur, the applicant has already been granted bail by the court below subject to 

Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. Single case is shown in the gang-chart against the applicant. On account of single case provision of Gangster Act has been imposed. The applicant is on bail in the case shown in the gang chart. Bail order is annexed with bail application. He next contended that the applicant is neither involved in any anti-social activities nor a leader of any gang. The applicant is

A perusal of the above noted observations of the Apex Court indicates that the Special Leave Petition of the UPSIDC was dismissed on three grounds:- (1) firstly that the possession of the acquired land had not been taken on 23.3.1990, which fact was noted from the statement of the Special Land Acquisition Officer in the counter affidavit filed in a Writ Petition No. 5341 of 1999. (2) The second ground was that the urgency provisions contained in Section 17 could not have been invoked for the acq

Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for grant of bail and submitted that applicant was arrested alongwith stolen mobiles, but he does not dispute this fact that the alleged mobiles were not connected with the crime in question. Considering the rival submissions of learned counsel for parties, material available on record, contents of F.I.R., other relevant documents, nature of offence as well as facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released

(c) The Committee members will not be called as witnesses. (d) Every complaint under Section 498A received by the police or the Magistrate be referred to and looked into by such committee. Such committee may have interaction with the parties personally or by means of telephone or any other mode of communication including electronic communication. (e) Report of such committee be given to the Authority by whom the complaint is referred to it latest within one month from the date of receipt of comp

High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad - 1954