Kumari Saroj Rawat vs Secretary, Bar Council High Court ...
Judges: Desai, B Mukerji
30 April, 1954·2. The petitioner alleges that she passed the LL. B. Examination from the University of Lucknow in the year 1952 and that thereafter she completed one year's training "in chambers" in accordance with Rule 1 of the rules framed under Section 9 of the Indian Bar Councils Act of 1926. She further state...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Brij Mohan Dixit vs Gobardhan And Ors.
Judges: B M Lall
30 April, 1954·Rule 2 imposes further restrictions on the right of presentation of such petitions and lays down that except in certain given circumstances the application for review must be presented to the very Judge who passed the order or made the decree sought to be reviewed. If the learned Judge has been tran...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kumari Saroj Rawat vs Secretary, Bar Council High ...
Judges: Desai, B Mukerji
30 April, 1954·2. The petitioner alleges that she passed the LL. B. Examination from the University of Lucknow in the year 1952 and that thereatfer she completed one year's training "in chambers" in accordance with Rule 1 of the rules framed under Section 9 of the Indian Bar Councils Act of 1926. She further state...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
L. Sheo Narain Lal, In Re. vs Unknown
Judges:
29 April, 1954·The assessee and his wife belonged to well-to-do families and the claim of Anchi Bai was that her father and father-in-law had been, on ceremonial and other occasions, making gifts of cash and jewellery to her and that her father-in-law had left a sum of Rs. 15,000 to her under his will which she go...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Parma Nand And Ors. vs Sm. Chhimmawati And Anr.
Judges: B M Lall
28 April, 1954·1. This is a second appeal by the plaintiffs. A suit for possession under Section 9, Specific Relief Act, was instituted by the respondent against one Sm. Savitri and her husband Banarasi Das. During the pendency of that suit the present appellants purchased the property from Smt. Savitri. They were...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Onkar Mal And Ors. vs Ram Sarup And Ors.
Judges: Malik, V Bhargava, H Shankar
28 April, 1954·Har Prasad', AIR 1945 Oudh 207 (B) for the contrary proposition that where on the finding of the two Courts below it appears that the plaintiff was out of possession of the share claimed in a partition suit, he should be asked to pay 'ad valorem' court-fee on the full value of his share before the a...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
State Of Uttar Pradesh vs Kailash
Judges: R Dayal
28 April, 1954·It is contended for the State that the learned Sessions Judge had no jurisdiction to pass this order granting bail and that, therefore, this order should be cancelled. The question to decide then is whether the learned Sessions Judge could grant bail to Kailash, who had neither been arrested nor det...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Maqsood Khan vs State, Through Mohd. Raza Khan And ...
Judges: Beg
23 April, 1954·I do decide and declare that he is in posses sion of the said plots of land and entitled to retain such possession until ousted by due course of law, and do strictly forbid any disturbance of his possession in the meantime. Given under my hand and seal of the Court this 28th day of August, 1953." Th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sheo Murar And Ors. vs State
Judges: R Singh
21 April, 1954·1. This is an application in revision under Sections 435/439, Criminal P. C., and under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India against the order of S. D. M. Malihabad, Lucknow dismissing an application in revision against the order passed by the Panchayati Adalat, Gonda Moazam Nagar. 2. I...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
L. Baij Nath vs Commissioner Of Income-Tax, U. P. ...
Judges:
15 April, 1954·We, therefore, proceed to draw up another statement of case in pursuance of the above directions. 2. The present reference arises out of the Tribunals order, dated 20th July, 1942, in 25 A. P. A. No. 1 (C. P.) of 1942-43, in connection with the assessment year 1941-42. The assessee had been claiming...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.