Raj Deo Rai vs Brahmdeo Rai And Anr.
Judges:
30 October, 1936·2. But the main objection to the claim of the plaintiff appears to me to be that the restraint on alienation which the compromise seeks to impose is one which is contrary to law. Learned Counsel argued that under Section 28, T.P. Act, an interest may be created to accrue to any person with the condi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Raj Deo Rai vs Brahmdeo Rai And Anr.
Judges: Bennet
30 October, 1936·2. But the main objection to the claim of the plaintiff appears to me to be that the restraint on alienation which the compromise seeks to impose is one which is contrary to law. Learned Counsel argued that under Section 28, Transfer of Property Act, an interest may be created to accrue to any perso...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sohan Lal And Ors. vs Zorawar Singh And Ors.
Judges:
29 October, 1936·6. Zorawar Singh, therefore, made common cause with the other plaintiffs of the preemption suit in order to reap the fruits of the pre-emption decree. The entire sum of Rs. 21,750 was deposited in Court on 23rd June 1921 after allowing three months for the filing of an appeal against the preemption ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Badri Prasad vs Mt. Janki And Anr.
Judges:
29 October, 1936·1. This is a second appeal by Badri Prasad, defendant 1, against a decree of the lower appellate Court granting a declaration that the plaintiff-respondent Mt. Janki is the owner of a house which appellant Badri Prasad had got sold in auction sale to respondent 2. Badri Prasad obtained a simple mort...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Sarju Bai vs Chairman, Municipal Board And ...
Judges:
28 October, 1936·------------------------------ 2. The estate which is a large zamindari estate of Bijai Earn was held after him by his son Har Lal and after Har Lal by his son Raghubir Sahai, who died about the year 1900. His widow, Mt. Kesar Bai, held the estate as a limited owner for a short time, and on her deat...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sipahi Lal vs Pandit Suraj Sahai
Judges: Harries
28 October, 1936·2. The opposite party has taken a preliminary objection and has contended that no revision lies from such an order. The matter arose in this way: Proceedings were first taken before a learned Munsif under Section 476, Criminal Procedure Code. A. preliminary enquiry was held but the learned Munsif wa...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Alakh Narain Singh And Ors. vs Thakur Dayal Singh And Ors.
Judges:
28 October, 1936·JUDGMENT Niamatullah, J. 1. This is a defendants appeal arising out of a suit for redemption. The plaintiff's right to redeem was questioned on the ground that he was not the heir of the original mortgagor who has since died. The plaintiff claimed to be the nearest heir of the mortgagor according to...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bateshwari Prasad vs Secretary Of State
Judges:
27 October, 1936·1. This is a second appeal by the plaintiff whose suit against the Secretary of State for India in Council for Rs. 114-8-0 and a declaration that certain articles belong to the plaintiff has been dismissed by the two lower Courts. The suit arose as follows : The wife and sister-in-law of the plainti...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chaudhry Bindraban And Ors. vs Chotey Lal
Judges:
21 October, 1936·1. This is an application in Civil Revision under Section 25, Small Cause Court Act. The judgment-debtor is an agriculturist. The decree-holder moved the-Court to create a charge on the immoveable property of the judgment-debtor in virtue of the terms of Section 3, Sub-section (2), U.P. Agriculturis...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Attar Singh vs Debi Sahai And Ors.
Judges:
21 October, 1936·The plaintiffs and defendant 2 may be put in actual and absolute possession of the land, etc., by ejectment of the defendants. 2. Defendant 2 did not appear at the trial at all, and does not appear to have engaged a counsel. The trial Court decreed the claim in the following words : The suit is decr...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.