Mt. Anto vs Mt. Reoti Kuar And Ors.
Judges:
31 August, 1936·2. Subsequently on attaining majority the sons made two transfers on the 24th June 1921, and 27th October 1926, in favour of the contesting defendants. In this suit the sons admitted that maintenance allowances had been paid to the mother for six years, but said that they had remained outstanding fo...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohammad Wahid Khan vs District Board
Judges:
28 August, 1936·If any person is dispossessed without his consent of immoveable property otherwise than in due course of law, he or any person claiming through him may, by suit recover possession thereof notwithstanding any other title that may be set up in such suit. 2. Now "immoveable property" for the purpose of...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Tej Bahadur And Ors. vs (Firm) Kothi Radha Kishan-Gopi ...
Judges:
27 August, 1936·It is clear that, on 1st April 1873, the plaintiff's suit was barred by limitation under the Act of 1871, and the Act of 1877 could not revive the plaintiff's right so barred.... 7. Their Lordships followed the earlier case in Appasami Odayar v. Subramanya Odayar (1889) 12 Mad 26. In Nehal Chandra R...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Har Prasad And Anr. vs Lala Bool Chand
Judges:
27 August, 1936·ORDER 1. The question referred to this Bench is whether the appellant can claim as of right that this appeal should be heard by a Bench of two Judges of this Court. The valuation of the appeal is Rs. 1,200 and at the time when it was filed it was cognizable by two Judges under the rules made by this...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mahatab Singh And Ors. vs Raja Durga Narain Singh And Anr.
Judges:
25 August, 1936·4. In Partab Singh v. Bhabuti Singh (1913) 35 All 487, their Lordships of the Privy Council, at pp. 496 and 497, observed as follows: This Board has held in Manohar Lal v. Jadunath Singh (1906) 28 All 585 that in cases to which Section 462, Civil P.C. 1882, applies there ought to be evidence that th...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Raghubir Sahai vs Wali Hussain Khan And Ors.
Judges:
25 August, 1936·ORDER Bennet, J. 1. In this case a complainant Raghubir Sahai applies in revision against the orders of a Magistrate and of the District Magistrate in revision refusing to allow the complainant to produce a further witness against the accused. The accused persons were being tried under Sections 379 ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
B. Gurmanj Saran vs Radha Swami Sat Sang Sabha
Judges:
25 August, 1936·1. This is an application in revision asking that three orders passed by the District Magistrate of Agra should be set aside. These orders were passed as a result of a dispute between the two sections of the believers in the Radhaswami religion. These two sections are known as the Dayal Bagh and the...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mt. Razina Khatun And Ors. vs Mt. Abida Khatun
Judges:
24 August, 1936·2. There was another issue as to whether the claim was barred by Sections 52 and 53, T.P. Act. The Court below has found that the amount of the dower debt due to the plaintiff was in fact Rs. 52,000 and has accepted as proof of it an entry in a diary in the handwriting of the deceased husband of Mt....
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
(Maulvi) Abdul Rab vs Hakim Mohammad Hasan Khan
Judges:
22 August, 1936·1. This is a second appeal against a decree of the Subordinate Judge of Pilibhit. Before discussing the question of law involved it is necessary to set forth some facts. In the year 1905 Haji Ala Bakhsh, the grand-father of the plaintiff, made a wakf of certain landed property. He constituted himsel...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Vishwa Nath Khanna vs Shiam Krishna
Judges:
22 August, 1936·A ward shall not be competent to transfer or create any charge on, or interest in, any part of his property which is under the superintendence of the Court of Wards, or to enter into any contract which may involve him in pecuniary liability. This section has to be read with Sections 11 and 68, Contr...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.