Suraj Ket Prasad vs Chandra Mul And Ors.
Judges:
14 August, 1933·(a) It may be declared by the Court that the properties mentioned at the foot of the plaint are the ancestral family properties of the plaintiff and that, the plaintiff and defendant 5 are the joint owners thereof, (b) It may be declared by the Court that the compromise dated 20th November 1919, dec...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mt. Akbari Begam vs Rahmat Husain And Ors.
Judges:
14 August, 1933·32. In regard to the power to refer to arbitration it has been held in a number of rulings that a pleader without special authority cannot make a reference Jaipal Tewari v. Tapeswar Tewari AIR 1917 Pat 136, Sheo Das v. Brij Nandan (1903) 7 C W N 343, Ramjiwan v. Kalicharan (1907) 29 All 429, Dwarkan...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Suraj Ket Prasad vs Chandra Mul And Ors.
Judges: Sulaiman, Collister
14 August, 1933·(a) It may be declared by the Court that the properties mentioned at the foot of the plaint are the ancestral family properties of the plaintiff and that the plaintiff and defendant No. 5 are the joint owners thereof, (b) It may be declared by the Court that the compromise dated November 20, 1919, d...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
L. Narayan Dass vs Mt. Taravali
Judges:
11 August, 1933·JUDGMENT Young, J. 1. This is an execution second appeal from the decision of the learned District Judge of Moradabad. The only point that arises in this case is the question of limitation. It appears that the decree-holder obtained a decree and made an application in execution on 11th August 1927. ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mt. Hasina Begum vs Munshi Abdul Hafiz
Judges:
11 August, 1933·2. After the death of Abdul Jamil, his three brothers and sister instituted four suits for profits in Bent Court against his heirs (Mt. Hasina Begum and others). Two of these suits related to villages in which Abdul Jamil was a lambardar and they were instituted under Section 226, Agra Tenancy Act, ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mt. Rajeshwari Bibi And Ors. vs B. Hari Ram
Judges:
09 August, 1933·JUDGMENT Sulaiman, C.J. 1. This is an application in revision from an order, dated 12th November 1932 passed by an Additional Subordinate Judge of Allahabad, dismissing the applicants' objection under Order 21, Rule 58, Civil P.C. There was a simple money decree in execution against Sat Narain Prasa...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
B. Surendra Narain Singh vs Raja Lal Bahadur Singh And Ors.
Judges:
09 August, 1933·2. Two questions emerge from the above facts: (1) Whether the appeal can be said t6 have been presented on 5th April 1933, in spite of the fact that copy of the formal order was filed after the expiry of limitation; if this question is answered in the affirmative, no question of limitation can arise...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Raza Ali Khan vs Rahat Husain Khan And Ors.
Judges:
09 August, 1933·1. This is a plaintiff's second appeal arising out of a suit instituted by him against Rahat Husain, defendant 1, on foot of a promissory note. The plaintiff's case was that Rabat Husain had executed a promissory note for Rs. 900 in favour of Ali Ahmad, defendant 1, on 26th November 1928, that he wa...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ganpat Kewat vs Raja Ram Gopal Singh
Judges:
09 August, 1933·2. For 1333 and 1334F the plaintiff appellant paid Rs. 32 only. For the Rabi of 1335F he paid Rs. 16 but it is alleged that the defendant respondent credited Rs. 6 only on account of Rabi of 1335F and appropriated the remaining Rs. 10 on account of arrears for 1333-34F. The defendant respondent's ca...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Hari Das Sahu vs Musammat Naima Bibi And Ors.
Judges: Bennet, Collister
08 August, 1933·JUDGMENT 1. This is a revision arising out of a partition suit in the Court of an Assistant Collector. March 24, 1920, was fixed for filing objections under Section 110 of the Land Revenue Act. No objections were filed within the period allowed by law. The partition proceedings were then begun, and ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.