Mt. Karimunnissa Bibi vs Mira Baksh And Ors.
Judges:
31 May, 1929·1. The plaintiff sued on an allegation that her right of privacy had been infringed by certain constructions which the defendant had made. The trial Court gave a decree. The lower appellate Court had dismissed the plaintiff's suit. It was admitted (I take this fact from the judgment) that there is "...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Lal Behari Lal vs The Allahabad Bank Ltd. Cawnpore ...
Judges: N Ullah, Bennet
31 May, 1929·2. The chief point argued before us on behalf of the appellant is that his liability was only that of a surety and not of a principal. If this proposition were conceded, it was argued for the appellant that the Bank had given time to Jagan Nath without the consent of the appellant and that, therefor...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
(Lal) Behari Lal vs Allahabad Bank, Ltd. And Anr.
Judges:
31 May, 1929·1. This is an appeal by one of the defendants, L. Behari Lal, against the decree passed by the learned Subordinate Judge of Cawnpore, awarding to the plaintiff-respondent, the Allahabad. Bank, Ltd., the balance due on a (promissory note. It is admitted that this promissory note for Rs. 25,000, dated...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sri Kishan Pandey vs Ghana Nand Joshi And Anr.
Judges:
30 May, 1929·4. There are really therefore two questions: (1) Did the Commissioner take a wrong view as to on whom the initial burden of proof lay? (2) Did the Commissioner come to a wrong decision on the question of limitation? 5. Dr. Katju for the plaintiff has drawn our attention to a passage in the decision ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Surjan Kunwari vs Shantanand Gir And Anr.
Judges: V T April, 1929, T I Council
28 May, 1929·2. The Subordinate Judge has rejected this objection and we think rightly. We have had the various orders, applications and affidavits relating to this question of security put before us in great detail and at great length. Taking isolated sentences here and there it is possible, as the learned Subo...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Piare Lal And Ors. vs Jhabba Lal
Judges:
17 May, 1929·1. This is a plaintiffs' appeal arising out of a suit for profits under Section 164 of the old Tenancy Act brought against the lambardar. Three plaintiffs sued in the one suit, and it is immaterial whether their shares were equal or unequal. The question was raised whether the three plaintiffs could...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Govind Singh vs Manglu And Ors.
Judges:
17 May, 1929·1. This is a plaintiff's appeal arising out of a suit for pre-emption of property transferred under a sale-deed dated 3rd August 1925. The suit was instituted on 1st July 1926. During the pendency of the suit the Vendees obtained a share in the village from the vendor Sukhdeo under a deed which was ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Natha Ram vs Ram Gir And Ors.
Judges:
15 May, 1929·1. The plaintiffs in this suit were judgment-debtors in a mortgage decree. The property which was mortgaged was 3/4th biswas in certain khatas, and a decree for sale was passed against that share. By mistake in the sale proclamation the property was stated to be 1 1/4 biswas in accordance with the c...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Jagmohan Singh And Ors. vs Ram Khilawan Dube And Ors.
Judges:
15 May, 1929·8. That being the position, the question is whether the High Court has jurisdiction under Section 115. Civil P.C. to interfere with such an order. I am clearly of opinion that the High Court has not. There must always be a distinction between an appellate jurisdiction and a revisional jurisdiction. ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Gajram Singh And Anr. vs Balwant Singh And Anr.
Judges:
14 May, 1929·1. Parties are cosharers in a certain mahal, neither of them being the lambardar. The plaintiffs-respondents brought the suit, out of which this appeal has arisen, for settlement of account under Section 165, Agra Tenancy Act 2 of 1901. They claimed profits to the extent of their share out of the en...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.