Subedar Singh vs Komal Singh And Anr.
Judges:
27 June, 1929·1. There is no force in this appeal. The plaintiff's father sold a certain 5 biswas share of the family property to the defendant Komal Singh and also relinquished sir plots. In accordance with the relinquishment Komal Singh was put in possession. The plaintiff did not attack the sale itself as a me...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Bhagwan Das vs Town Mag. Budaun And Ors.
Judges:
27 June, 1929·3. Defendants 2 to 4 contested the suit on the ground that the platform had been in existence for more than 20 years and that the plaintiff's suit was liable to dismissal because he had not suffered any special damage beyond what he did in common with all other members of the public affected by the ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ata Karim vs Municipal Board And Anr.
Judges:
27 June, 1929·4. There can be no manner of doubt that the suit launched by the plaintiff was a suit of a civil nature and that under Section 9, Civil P.C., the Court had jurisdiction to entertain all suits of a civil nature excepting suits of which their cognizance was either expressly or impliedly barred: If a M...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mt. Janak Dulari vs Bishambher Nath And Ors.
Judges:
26 June, 1929·2. By the new Act an appeal in a suit for profits against the decree of an Assistant Collector of the first class is allowed in the Court of the District Judge, provided the amount of value of the subject matter of the suit exceeds Rs. 200. 3. It would thus appear that if the right of appeal was gov...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Kayastha Co. Ltd. vs Sita Ram Dubey
Judges:
26 June, 1929·39. In the present case the application for execution dated 10th January 1922 fulfilled the requirements of Order 21, Rule 10, Civil P.C., and was entertained by the Court on 7th February 1922. Upon this application which was accepted by the Court as a good application notice was directed to be issu...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Uma Shankar Lal And Ors. vs Mahabir Prasad And Ors.
Judges:
26 June, 1929·2. The learned Subordinate Judge has found that Dip Narain Lal and Ramapat Lal were separate, that the house had not been acquired for the Rajput girl but was a part of the ancestral property and that the defendant had overhauled the house and spent Rs. 1,050 on it. He, however, held the plaintiffs ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mohammad Ibrahim Quareshi And ... vs Syed Abdul Hamid
Judges:
26 June, 1929·1. This second appeal arises from a suit brought under the following circumstances: The mutwallis of a certain religious trust brought a suit against certain persons which was dismissed by the District Judge of Agra. An appeal was filed in the High Court and this appeal also was dismissed. The respo...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Din Hazari Lal vs Mansa Ram Murlidhar
Judges:
25 June, 1929·5. The first issue is decided in the plaintiff's favour, that Ramsaran was the sole proprietor of defendant firm, and being a minor was properly represented by his mother as certificated guardian and the suit as framed was maintainable. No further contention has arisen before us in regard to this is...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mahant Shantanand Gir vs Mahant Basudevanand Gir
Judges: Boys, Pullan
25 June, 1929·2. One Mahant Shantanand Gir has got a decree against Mahant Basudevanand Gir. The latter has appealed to the Privy Council and has had to deposit in this Court a sum of Rs. 4,005 12-0 for the costs of the Privy Council and for printing charges. The decree-holder has now applied to attach this amoun...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
B. Shyam Lal And Ors. vs L. Badri Prasad
Judges:
25 June, 1929·1. This second appeal arises from a suit brought by a minor son of a Hindu for setting aside a sale of a house and a shop by his father Shankar Lal. It was alleged in the plaint that the father was of bad character and a vagabond who had been spending the income of the property for unlawful purposes...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.