Dip Chand vs Sheo Prasad And Ors.
Judges:
30 April, 1929·5. Incidently, we may mention that the sale in favour of Shiam Behari, at any rate, might have been set aside. However, that is a point which has not been discussed before us, and need not be separately considered, in the view we take of the whole case. 6. The judgment-debtor took an appeal to the l...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rachhpal Singh vs Sheo Ratan Singh And Ors.
Judges:
30 April, 1929·The suit is withdrawn and permission is given to file a fresh suit on such and such terms being fulfilled. 8. The suit, therefore, ceases to be a pending suit and has been finally disposed of. 9. Secondly, I am unable to see any reason why if permission to file a second suit has been granted subject...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Rameshwar Singh And Ors. vs The Kanyakubja Bank Of India Ltd. ...
Judges: Mukerji, Niamatullah
30 April, 1929·1. This appeal and Appeal No. 263 of 1926 arise out of two different suits which were tried together, for the sake of convenience, the parties to the two suits being practically the same. 2. The suits related to money said to have been recoverable by the Kanyakubja Bank of India, Ltd., now gone into...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Johari Mal And Anr. vs Balmakund And Ors.
Judges: Niamatullah, Bennet
30 April, 1929·2. The suit has been thrown out by both the lower Courts on the ground that it is within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Revenue Court. The plaintiffs appeal to this Court. 3. It should be noticed that the lower Courts dismissed the suit instead of returning the plaint for presentation to the Reve...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Prohit Basant Lal And Anr. vs Basanti And Ors.
Judges:
30 April, 1929·JUDGMENT 1. This is a short appeal and is on behalf of two of the several defendants in the suit. The suit was based on two mortgages. A preliminary decree was made in the Court of first instance, and an appeal was lodged in this Court. The appeal was decided on 17th July 1922. Within three years of...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Moola vs Bhuriya And Anr.
Judges:
29 April, 1929·(a) That it may be declared that the plaintiff is the adopted son of Sahi Ram deceased, and that he is in possession as such of the estate of Sahi Ram aforesaid, laid at Rs. 1000. (b) That an injunction may be issued to the defendants restraining them from offering obstructions to the possession of ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ghura Koer vs Bishun Ram And Ors.
Judges:
29 April, 1929·1. This appeal is by one who was defendant 2 in the suit. It arises out of a claim for recovery of mortgage money by sale of two out of 15 properties originally mortgaged. The mortgage was a simple one and was executed on 6th January 1911 for a sum of Rs. 6,999-15-0. The appellant now represents the...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Baijnath vs Dhani Ram
Judges:
26 April, 1929·The order is contrary to judgment and it does not decide the points which were to be decided. The third point was: The judgment shows that the wall at some places belongs to the defendant, but the order as contrary to that, 3. There were also other points taken. The learned Munsif fixed 26th March f...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chandrika Rai vs Srikant Rai
Judges:
26 April, 1929·JUDGMENT 1. This is an application by one Chandrika Rai against an order passed by the learned District Judge of Ghazipur on 1st September 1927, directing the applicant to pay to the respondent a certain sum of money which was to be reduced, partially, in the case of his returning certain bullocks. ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ram Sarup And Ors. vs Ram Richtpal And Ors.
Judges:
26 April, 1929·2. The lower appellate Court gave effect to the contention of Bhup Singh's representatives to the effect that they had priority to the extent of Rs. 3,063-9-0 which Bhup Singh had paid in satisfaction of the decree obtained by Faqir Chand on the basis of a mortgage dated 29th March 1901. It may be m...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.