Deonandan Singh And Ors. vs Musafir Singh And Ors.
Judges:
06 July, 1926·2. The suit was defended on the ground that it was barred by limitation and also on the ground that the sale was for legal necessity. 3. Both the Courts below have dismissed the suit both on the ground of limitation and on the ground of legal necessity. 4. The first point raised before me in second ...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Ganga Ram vs Chunni Lal
Judges:
06 July, 1926·2. Chunni Lal's suit was dismissed by the Court of first instance, but has been decreed by the Court of first appeal. The learned Judge found that Chunni Lal's predecessors, Chatri and Ghanshiam, had purchased the land in suit from the proprietors, Hira Singh and Ajit Singh. He explained why, in spi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sukhbir Singh And Ors. vs Secretary Of State For India
Judges:
05 July, 1926·1. These two appeals arise out of references under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act. Under Section 9 of the Land Acquisition Act (1 of 1894) notice was given by the Collector to the appellants that Government intended to take possession of their land for the purpose of a market at Muzaffar Nag...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Maharaj Singh And Ors. vs Sri Raja Suryapal Singh
Judges:
04 July, 1926·2. It appears that the Government revenue of the village has been assigned to a class of persons who collect it from the landholders liable to pay the same. Manohar Lal is an assignee to the extent of eight shares in patti No. 6. Similarly Venkateshwar is entitled to four shares. Plaintiff is the mo...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Sheo Partab Singh And Anr. vs Tajammul Husain And Ors.
Judges:
02 July, 1926·1. This was a suit to recover money due on two mortgages. The first mortgage was dated the 21st July 1892. The mortgage money became due on 21st of July 1897 and the period of limitation for the suit, under Article 132, expired on the 21st of July 1909. The second mortgage was dated the 12th of Sept...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Enayat Husain vs King-Emperor
Judges:
02 July, 1926·1. Enayet Husain has been convicted under Section 377, Indian Penal Code, and sentenced do 5 years' rigorous imprisonment. The trial was before an Assistant Sessions Judge with a jury. 2. The only question is whether there was misdirection in this case. The heads of charge, as noted down by the lear...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Lachhman Prasad And Ors. vs Salu Salik Chand And Ors.
Judges:
01 July, 1926·1. This was a suit by the son and grandson of one Kishen Lal who died in 1907 to recover joint family property which on Kishen Lal's death wrongly passed into the hands of one Mt. Gobindi and was subsequently transferred by her. The sole question for decision is one of limitation. The suit is brough...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Mahmud Hasan And Ors. vs Lauti Ram And Ors.
Judges:
01 July, 1926·1. On the 28th of May 1897, five properties were usufructuarily mortgaged in favour of two ladies, Aminat-un-nissa and Ghafur-un-nissa. The money agreed to be advanced by the first-named lady was Rs. 27,500, and by the second Rs. 1,500. The way in which the detail of the consideration money was made...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Hakim Mahmud Hasan And Ors. vs Lala Lauti Ram And ...
Judges: G Mears, King
01 July, 1926·2. The plaintiff asked for a declaration that the property Ibrahimpur was not subject to any charge created under the mortgage-deeds and there was an alternative prayer that if there was any charge it was limited' to Rs. 987-1-9 and there was a prayer, in its nature formal, that any other relief whi...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Chunni Lal vs Manik Chand And Anr.
Judges:
01 July, 1926·2. In the meantime Ram Saroop, on the allegation that a sum of Rs. 150 was due to him as rent from Manik Chand, his sub-tenant made a distraint of the very some crops. The 21st of November 1921 was fixed by the revenue Court for the sale of these crops. 3. The plaintiff, whose attachment was still s...
High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.