Asgar Haji Ayub Mungrani vs State Of Gujarat
Judges:
14 September, 2012·Let Notice be issued on the respondents. Since Ms.Calla has already entered appearance on behalf of respondent no.1, State of Gujarat, the service is waived. Notice returnable on 26th April 2013. In the meantime, the office is directed to call for the explanation of the trial Court as to why the dir...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kachchh Sagar - Through ... vs State Of Gujarat - Thro Director Of ...
Judges:
14 September, 2012·Notice returnable on 17.9.2012. Direct service is permitted today.[R.M.CHHAYA, J.] mrpandya...
High Court Of Gujarat
Fulchand Chandmal Jain vs D.N.Anerao Or His Successor &
Judges:
14 September, 2012·Shri D.M. Ahuja, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant seeks time as his Counsel is not available. This Court is ready to take up the matter, however, it is the learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant, who prays for time. Hence, stand over to 09/11/2012.(M.R. SHAH, J.) ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ramaben M Trivedi vs State Of Gujarat & 4
Judges:
14 September, 2012·Notice to the Respondents returnable on 19th October, 2012.Learned APP Ms. Archana Raval waives service of Notice for Respondent No.1-State of Gujarat.Ad-interim relief in terms of paragraph 10(C) is granted till then.(Rajesh H. Shukla,J) Jayanti*...
High Court Of Gujarat
Qasim Yusuf Bhimla vs State Of Gujarat & 4
Judges:
14 September, 2012·Notice to the Respondents returnable on 28th September, 2012.Learned APP Ms. Archana Raval waives service of Notice for Respondent No.1-State of Gujarat.Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 are permitted to be served by Direct Service.(Rajesh H. Shukla,J) Jayanti*...
High Court Of Gujarat
Imran Apartment Owners' Asso. ... vs Chief Controlling Revenue ...
Judges:
14 September, 2012·Heard Mr. Mehta, learned advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Shah, learned AGP for respondents.Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and the contentions raised by the petitioner and the reply affidavit filed by the respondents, the petition requires consideration.Hence, Rule.So fa...
High Court Of Gujarat
Commissioner Of Income Tax Iii vs The
Judges:
14 September, 2012·(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH)1. The present appeal has been preferred by the appellant-revenue challenging the impugned order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad D Bench, Ahmedabad dated 14/09/2012 by which in an appeal preferred by the respondent-assessee the learned tr...
High Court Of Gujarat
Netsweeper vs Org
Judges:
14 September, 2012·Ms.Anushree Kapadia, learned advocate, submits that she may be permitted to withdraw her appearance as advocate for the petitioner as Mr.B.S.Soparkar, learned advocate, would be appearing for the petitioner, henceforth.The Registry has also put up a Note dated 14.09.2012 in this regard for passing o...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appeal From Order No. 368 Of 2012 vs Sagarbhai Dipabhai Parmar & 3 ­
Judges:
14 September, 2012·AO/368/2012 1/1 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD APPEAL FROM ORDER No. 368 of 2012 With CIVIL APPLICATION No. 10481 of 2012 In APPEAL FROM ORDER No. 368 of 2012 ====================================== RAMANLAL CHUTHALAL SOLANKI Appellant(s) Versus SAGARBHAI DIPABHAI PARMAR & 3 Resp...
High Court Of Gujarat
Prabhatsinh vs Jodhabhai
Judges:
14 September, 2012·Learned advocate Mr.K.R.Dave submits that he has instructions to appear for respondent. At his request, S.O. to 7.11.2012.Learned advocate appearing for Mr.Yagnik submits that the amount of Rs.10 lacs, as directed by order dated 14.9.2012 is already deposited by the trial Court and xerox copy of rec...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.