Gopal Glass
Judges:
26 September, 2012·1. The petitioners in this group of petitions are consumers of respondent No.2 GAIL (India) Ltd. and all petitioners have, entered into contract with respondent No.2 for sale / supply of gas.2. The facts and circumstances involved in and leading to submissions of present petitions are almost...
High Court Of Gujarat
Gopal Glass
Judges:
26 September, 2012·1. The petitioners in this group of petitions are consumers of respondent No.2 GAIL (India) Ltd. and all petitioners have, entered into contract with respondent No.2 for sale / supply of gas.2. The facts and circumstances involved in and leading to submissions of present petitions are almost...
High Court Of Gujarat
Gopal Glass
Judges:
26 September, 2012·1. The petitioners in this group of petitions are consumers of respondent No.2 GAIL (India) Ltd. and all petitioners have, entered into contract with respondent No.2 for sale / supply of gas.2. The facts and circumstances involved in and leading to submissions of present petitions are almost...
High Court Of Gujarat
Thakor Mahendraji Mangalji & 9 vs State Of Gujarat &
Judges:
26 September, 2012·Notice to the Respondents returnable on 3rd October, 2012.Learned APP Mr.H.L.Jani waives service of Notice for Respondent No.1-State of Gujarat.Respondent No.2 is permitted to be served by Direct Service.(Rajesh H. Shukla,J) Jayanti*...
High Court Of Gujarat
Popatji vs State
Judges: R M Chhaya
26 September, 2012·Notice to newly added respondent Nos.7/1 to 7/3 returnable on 12.10.2012. Mr. V.G. Dave, learned advocate waives service of notice on behalf of newly added respondent Nos.7/1 to 7/3.[R.M.CHHAYA, J.] mrpandya...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bahadursinh vs State
Judges: Sonia Gokani
26 September, 2012·Learned advocate Mr. Khandaria seeks to file his appearance on behalf of applicant. He is permitted to do so.Matter is adjourned to 8th October 2012.{Ms. Sonia Gokani, J.} deepak...
High Court Of Gujarat
Commissioner - Central Excise And ... vs 2] Whether The Tribunal Erred In ...
Judges:
26 September, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) Tax Appeal is admitted for consideration of following substantial questions of law :[1] Whether the Tribunal was justified in holding that the provisions of Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 1995, are not applicable in case of deemed Export ...
High Court Of Gujarat
State Of Gujarat Thro ... vs S R Rathod Junior Pharmacist
Judges:
26 September, 2012·Rule returnable on 09.01.2013.In the meantime, ad-interim relief in terms para 9(c) is granted.HC-NIC Page 1 of 1 Created On Mon Aug 14 10:37:15 IST 2017...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jakirmiya Mobinmiya & 3 vs None For
Judges:
26 September, 2012·When the matter is called out twice, learned advocate for the appellant, on both the calls, has not remained present. Hence, dismissed for default.[ C. L. SONI, J. ] vijay...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mustafa Manubhai Khokhar & vs Khatai Rasulbhai Amirbhai & 5
Judges:
26 September, 2012·When this appeal is taken up for hearing, learned advocate Mr. Pujara appearing for the respondent No.1 is not present. The matter is of 1995 and it is about deciding rights of the parties to the suit property. However, since Mr. Pujara is not present, in the interest of justice, as a last opportuni...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.