Special vs State
Judges:
04 May, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL) To be heard with Criminal Appeal No.4 of 2012.(JAYANT PATEL, J.) (PARESH UPADHYAY, J.) (vipul) Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
N vs State
Judges:
04 May, 2012·1. In this group of matters, a challenge is to the circular dated 25.2.2000 issued by the Finance Department of the State of Gujarat, whereby the provisions of para 1(iii) of the Resolution dated 15.12.1975 of the Finance Department came to be cancelled. Under the circular dated 15.12.1975, Governme...
High Court Of Gujarat
Canara vs Collector
Judges:
04 May, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) Let the matters appear on 11th May 2012.Interim relief granted earlier is extended till then.(Bhaskar Bhattacharya, Actg. C.J.) (J.B.Pardiwala, J.) /moin Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance : vs Ms. Ketty Mehta With Ms
Judges:
04 May, 2012·Learned Advocate Ms. Archana Acharya for the Respondent is permitted to delete 4 lines with regard to intimation to the learned Advocate from the Affidavit in Reply dated 30.4.2012.The present Civil Application has been filed for the interim relief on the ground stated in the Application, and after ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Hindalco vs State
Judges:
04 May, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) As submitted by learned advocate for the petitioner, we permit correction of the typographical error appearing at the last line of paragraph 2 at page 3 of the petition, where within first bracket the phrase "Mega Watt Hours" be rea...
High Court Of Gujarat
Triveni vs Labour
Judges:
04 May, 2012·1. The petitioner-firm by way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has challenged the judgment and award dated 09.08.2011 passed by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Bhavnagar in Reference (L.C.B.) No.134 of 1999 whereby, the Presiding Officer of the Labour Court has b...
High Court Of Gujarat
Vajubhai vs State
Judges:
04 May, 2012·Leave to amend the cause title of the application is granted by adding the proposed heirs of deceased respondent No.23, as respondents Nos. 23/1 and 23/2. The necessary amendment be carried out forthwith.Heard Mr.Amar D.Mithani, learned advocate for the applicants. He has placed reliance upon a judg...
High Court Of Gujarat
Chandrakantbhai vs Irsadkhan
Judges:
04 May, 2012·In view of the averments made in the applications, the prayer made in terms of paragraph No.7(i) and (ii) is granted. The applicant is permitted to serve the respondents by way of affixing the notice at conspicuous part of the residence/address. The applications stand disposed of.Office is directed ...
High Court Of Gujarat
J vs State
Judges:
04 May, 2012·Heard learned advocate for the petitioner in each of the petition.Notice returnable on 10.5.2012.Direct service is permitted to respondent NO.2.[ANANT S. DAVE, J.] //smita// Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Vinubhai vs State
Judges:
04 May, 2012·Heard learned advocates for the parties.Considering the facts and circumstances and the averments made in paragraph 2 to 2.8, conditions No. (e) and (g) imposed in order dated 31.3.2011 passed in Criminal Misc. Application No. 3390 of 2011 are hereby relaxation for a period of 90 days as prayed for....
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.