Margiben vs Priteshkumar
Judges:
09 May, 2012·In view of sick note of Mr. Paresh M. Dargi, learned advocate for the appellant, the matter is adjourned to 11th May, 2012.It is made clear that if Mr. Dargi, learned advocate for the appellant is not keeping good health, he will make alternative arrangement, by the next date of hearing, failing whi...
High Court Of Gujarat
Speical vs Patel
Judges:
09 May, 2012·The present First Appeals have been filed under sec. 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 read with sec. 96 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 being aggrieved with the impugned judgment and award passed by the Reference Court (4th Addl. Sr. Civil Judge, Patan) in Land Reference Case Nos. 2317 to 2320...
High Court Of Gujarat
Dalpatram vs Mohmmadbhai
Judges:
09 May, 2012·In view of the averments made in the application, the prayer made in terms of paragraph No.5(A) to (B) is granted. The application stands disposed of.Office to issue fresh notice in First Appeal returnable on 9th July 2012.[ K. S. JHAVERI, J. ] vijay Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mahmadkhan vs Nanduba
Judges:
09 May, 2012·The learned advocate for the petitioner prays for permission to make the correction in the survey number of the land in question.Permission to do so, is granted. The necessary amendment may be carried out forthwith.Heard Mr.S.M. Shah, learned advocate for the petitioner.Issue Notice, returnable on 0...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bharatbhai vs Ramanlal
Judges:
09 May, 2012·1. By way of this petition, the petitioners have prayed for the following reliefs :-[a] This petition be allowed.[b] Be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, direction and/or order to call for the records and proceedings from the Labour Court, Ahmedabad in BIR Applications No. 40/11 to 48/11 and I.E...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ajit vs Gujarat
Judges:
09 May, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE J. B. PARDIWALA) By way of this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner a resident of village Nani Bhalsan (Beraja) Taluka Kalavad, District Jamnagar has prayed for a writ of mandamus upon the respondent authorities to hold necessary inquiry a...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance vs Mr Rahul Dave
Judges:
09 May, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.L. SONI) Applicant has made out substantial grounds which prevented the applicant from filing the first appeal within the prescribed time limit. We are, therefore, inclined to allow this application and condone the delay of 87 days occurred in filing the first appeal.A...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rambhai vs Chief
Judges:
09 May, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) This is an application for recall of an order dated August 25, 2010 passed by a Division Bench of this Court by which the Division Bench directed the appellant to remove the office objections before September 15, 2010 failing which,...
High Court Of Gujarat
Maha vs State
Judges:
09 May, 2012·1. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties.2. The reliefs claimed in this petition are substantially granted or in the process of being granted. It is, therefore, observed that if, ultimately, the petitioner is aggrieved by the action of the respondents, then it shall be open to them to fil...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.