Joy vs Julabha
Judges:
10 May, 2012·Learned counsel Ms. Abha Makwana, states that the bailiff has wrongly affixed the notice at the residence of Mr. Makwana Laljibhai. In support of her say, she had produced necessary documents on record. Hence, Mr. Trivedi, learned counsel for the appellant shall take necessary steps for unserved res...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jaykumar vs State
Judges:
10 May, 2012·When the petition is called out and taken up for hearing, learned advocate for petitioner is not present. Any request for adjournment or pass over is also not made. Instead of dismissing the petition for non-prosecution, hearing is adjourned. S.O. to 11th July 2012.(K.M.THAKER, J.) jani Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Virendrasinh vs State
Judges:
10 May, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI) Admit.Meanwhile, the parties shall exchange their affidavits. List this matter on 28.6.2012.Learned counsel for the appellant does not press the civil application and it is accordingly dismissed.(V.M.SAHAI,J) (A.J.DESAI,J) ***vcdarji Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
State vs Pw
Judges:
10 May, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.B.SHAH)1. This appeal under section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 arises out of the judgment and order dated 7.10.1991 passed by the learned Addl.Sessions Judge, Panchmahals at Godhra in Sessions Case No. 111 of 1991 whereby the accused was acquitted of a...
High Court Of Gujarat
Chhayaben vs State
Judges:
10 May, 2012·1. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by the petitioner - original complainant for the following main reliefs :"8(A) That the Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue appropriate writ, order or directions to the respondents no.1 -3 to take appropriate act...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rasik vs Indumatiben
Judges:
10 May, 2012·Having considered the submissions advanced by learned Senior Counsel Mr.Sanjanvala with learned advocate Mr.D.M.Popat for the appellant and considering the impugned order passed by the Trial Court, it transpires that the original suit was filed in the Year-2007 and below the temporary injunction app...
High Court Of Gujarat
Abdul vs State
Judges:
10 May, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE PARESH UPADHYAY) By way of this application, the applicant-convict has prayed that he be enlarged on temporary bail on the ground of marriage of cousin sister scheduled on 13th May, 2012.Since applicant of Criminal Misc. Application No.6082 of 2012 was permitted to atten...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mehandi vs State
Judges:
10 May, 2012·1. The present Special Criminal Application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been preferred by the petitioner-original accused no. 1 to quash and set aside the impugned order dated 30/05/2011 passed by the learned 3rd Addition...
High Court Of Gujarat
Abdul vs State
Judges:
10 May, 2012·This application is filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with first information report registered at CR No.I-34 of 2011 with Bharuch Taluka Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 465, 476, 468, 471, 181 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.Lear...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jorabhai vs Union
Judges:
10 May, 2012·The learned Senior Advocate has moved a Draft Amendment. The same is granted and may be carried out by tomorrow.Heard Mr.B.B. Naik, learned Senior Advocate with Mr.Kunan B. Naik, learned advocate for the petitioner.Issue Notice, returnable on 22.05.2012.In addition to the normal mode of service, Dir...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.