Jyotsnaben vs Heard
Judges:
13 March, 2012·1. Heard learned advocates for the parties and perused the papers on record.2. The petitioner being aggrieved by the judgement and order dated 31.07.1992 passed by the Assistant Judge, Mehsana in Regular Civil Appeal No. 171 of 1991 has preferred this Revision Application under section 29(2) of the ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kanchanben vs None For
Judges:
13 March, 2012·1. The present application has been filed for restoration of the main matter [First Appeal (Stamp) No.3166/2011] which has been dismissed for non-prosecution by the Court [Coram: Anant S. Dave,J.] vide order dated 10.10.2011.2. Learned advocate Mr.Devang Vyas for the applicants states that the offic...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jayantibhai vs Naginbhai
Judges:
13 March, 2012·1. Civil Application No. 7649/2011 under Section 5 of the Limitation Act has been preferred by the applicant to condone the delay of 360 days in filing the Second Appeal against the judgment and order dated 16/06/2009 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Narmada, Rajpipla in Regular Civi...
High Court Of Gujarat
East vs M. Sahai
Judges:
13 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI) ADMIT.To be heard along with O.J.Appeal No.10 of 2004 in Admiralty Suit No.14 of 2003.(V.M.SAHAI, J.) (A.J.DESAI, J.) syed/ Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Utran vs Gujarat
Judges:
13 March, 2012·Rule returnable on 11.04.2012.By way of Ad-interim relief, the impugned judgment and award dated 27.10.2009 passed by the Industrial Tribunal, Surat in Reference (I.C.) No.24/1987 shall remain stayed on condition that the petitioner shall deposit the entire amount with the Registry of this Court wit...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mukundbhai vs Unknown
Judges:
13 March, 2012·This Application is preferred to condone delay of 86 days in filing Misc. Civil Application and to recall and modify the order passed earlier on 8th July 2011.As the earlier order dated 8th July 2011 has already been recalled and the Court had dictated order in the open Court on 11th November 2011, ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Vikubhai vs State
Judges:
13 March, 2012·The endorsement on the Board indicates that Notices issued to respondents Nos.2, 4 to 8, have not been received back, either served or unserved and the affidavits of Direct Service in respect of the said respondents have not been filed.Mr.Virat G. Popat, learned advocate for the petitioner, submits ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Laxmiben vs Nanjibhai
Judges:
13 March, 2012·1. Heard learned advocates for the appellant and perused the papers on record. Though served none appears for the respondent.2. The appellant herein has challenged the award dated 08.04.1999 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Aux.), Rajkot in Motor Accident Claims Petition No. 218 of 1991...
High Court Of Gujarat
Veenaben vs Babubhai
Judges:
13 March, 2012·1. The appellants herein have challenged the award dated 26.02.1999 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Aux.), Baroda in Motor Accident Claims Petition No. 1683 of 1992 so far as the Tribunal awarded only Rs. 1,21,000/-as compensation with interest and costs.2. It is the case of the appell...
High Court Of Gujarat
Hamid vs State
Judges:
13 March, 2012·[1] By way of present application, filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicant has prayed to release him on regular bail in connection with C.R.No.I-132 of 2006 registered with Dehgam Police Station.[2] Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned Additional...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.