Sandhya vs State Of Gujarat & 1 ­
Judges:
29 March, 2012·SANDHYA W/O BRIJESH GOSAI Applicant(s) Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & 1 Respondent(s) ====================================== Appearance :Mr. M.C. Barot for MR TEJAS M BAROT for Applicant Mr. J.K. Shah, APP, for respondent : 1, None for Respondent(s) : 2, ====================================== CORAM :...
High Court Of Gujarat
Special Civil Application No. ... vs Ms.Manisha Shah
Judges:
29 March, 2012·The present petition is preferred by the petitioner against the seizure order dated 19.7.02 passed by the respondent No.1 whereby the goods have been seized.2.Heard Mr.Prajapati for the petitioner and Ms.Manisha Shah, Ld.AGP for respondents. The contention raised on behalf of the petitioner is that ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Chhaganbhai vs Pratapbhai
Judges:
29 March, 2012·1. By way of this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have prayed for the following reliefs:-"(a) Present Special Civil Application may kindly be allowed. Order Dt.22.6.2011 passed by Ld. Principle Senior Civil Judge, Gondal below application Exh.12 in S...
High Court Of Gujarat
State vs Government Pleader For
Judges:
29 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA) Notice as to admission and interim relief returnable on 2nd April 2012. Direct service is permitted. In the meantime, if price bids of the tenders in question are opened, any decision thereon shall be subject to further orders that may be made in present pet...
High Court Of Gujarat
Criminal Misc.Application No. ... vs Mrs Ranjan B Patel For Petitioner ...
Judges:
29 March, 2012·Rule. Mr.IM Pandya Addl. Public Prosecutor waives service.2.The parties do not press for reasoned order. Considering the submissions made on behalf of the parties, and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on ba...
High Court Of Gujarat
Oriental vs Legal
Judges:
29 March, 2012·In spite of earlier order dated 05.03.2012, no action has been taken by the learned advocate for the appellant. Therefore, the present appeal stands dismissed for default. No order as to costs.(K.S.JHAVERI,J.) pawan Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Criminal Revision Application ... vs Mr Aj Desi Ld. App For
Judges:
29 March, 2012·(Per : MR.JUSTICE N.G.NANDI)1.It is stated by Mr. A.J.Desai, learned APP that State has also filed appeal being Criminal Appeal No.667 of 2002 for enhancement of the sentence imposed for the offence under Section 304 Part I of I.P.C., since according to State the conviction and sentence should have ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sujataben vs State
Judges:
29 March, 2012·1 Rule.Service is waived. Upon the joint request made by the learned advocates for the parties, this matter is taken up for final disposal.2 This application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [for short, 'the Code'] is filed by the applicants to quash the FIR being C.R. No.I-...
High Court Of Gujarat
Chiman vs State
Judges:
29 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL) Pursuant to the earlier order dated 13th March, 2012, it is reported that the applicant was taken to Hospital but was re-shifted to the jail soon thereafter. The medical papers are not produced on record. Under the circumstances, until, we consider the matt...
High Court Of Gujarat
Prabhatbhai vs Prabhubhai
Judges:
29 March, 2012·1. By way of this appeal, the appellant-original claimants has challenged the judgement and award dated 11.02.2010, passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal(Main), Kheda at Nadiad, in M.A.C.P. No.494 of 2009, whereby the tribunal has awarded compensation in the sum of Rs.1,30,500/- to the claima...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.