Nazuddin vs Divyesh
Judges:
15 March, 2012·Rule. Ms.KM Shah, learned advocate waives service of rule for respondent No.1 and Mr.KP Raval, learned APP waives service of rule for respondent No.2 - State.In both these matters, the petitioner is common and against him, respondent No.1 in Special Criminal Appln.No.326 of 2011 had filed Criminal C...
High Court Of Gujarat
Dhruvalbhai vs State
Judges:
15 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) Notice returnable on April 5, 2012.Direct service is permitted.[BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA, ACTING CJ.] [J.B.PARDIWALA, J.] pirzada/-Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ilaben vs Municipal
Judges:
15 March, 2012·Mr.Kunal D. Pandya, learned advocate states that Mr.Kaushal D. Pandya, learned advocate has received instructions to appear on behalf of respondent No.1 and prays for time in order to file the Vakalatnama and affidavit-in-reply.List on 16.04.2012.(Smt.Abhilasha Kumari, J.) ~gaurav~ Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
National vs Hakabhai
Judges:
15 March, 2012·1. In connection with the vehicular accident that took place on 03.04.2008 in which Pappusing Gurusing Parmar expired, the heirs and legal representatives of deceased preferred claim petition being M.A.C.P. No.198/2008 u/s.163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Go...
High Court Of Gujarat
Icici vs Farukbhai
Judges:
15 March, 2012·1. This appeal is directed against the award dated 04.08.2011 passed by learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Aux.), Bhavnagar in Motor Accident Claims Petition No. 320 of 2009, wherein the Tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs. 3,36,000/- along with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum from the date...
High Court Of Gujarat
Chandreshbhai vs Bhagwanji
Judges:
15 March, 2012·1. The present application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act has been preferred by the applicants to condone the delay of 144 days in preferring the Civil Revision Application.2. Though served, nobody appears on behalf of respondents.3. Hence, it appears that there is no opposition to the presen...
High Court Of Gujarat
Joharabibi vs Chandvji
Judges:
15 March, 2012·1. By way of this appeal, the appellants-original claimants have challenged the judgement and award dated 05.12.2002, passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ahmedabad, in M.A.C.P. No. 993 of 2000, whereby the tribunal has awarded compensation in the sum of Rs. 1,19,500/- to the claimants with...
High Court Of Gujarat
Vajubhai vs State
Judges:
15 March, 2012·The endorsement on the Board indicates that the affidavit of Direct Service for respondent No.2 has not been filed. Mr.Pranav S. Dave, learned Assistant Government Pleader, submits that he would be appearing for the District Collector, and prays for time, in order to take instructions and/or file an...
High Court Of Gujarat
Binaben vs Kulinkumar
Judges:
15 March, 2012·1. The present application has been preferred by the applicant-wife to stay further implementation and operation of the judgment and decree passed by both the Courts below.2. Having heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties and considering the fact that the main Secon...
High Court Of Gujarat
Icici vs Bhilubhai
Judges:
15 March, 2012·Mr.Hiren Modi, learned advocate states that he shall file appearance for respondents no. 3 & 4. In the view of the matter, Mr. Nanavati, learned advocate for the applicant states that he does not press this application at this stage. Application stands disposed of accordingly.(K.S.JHAVERI, J.) Divya...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.