Saiyedali vs State
Judges:
15 March, 2012·1. The applicant original accused has preferred this application for regular bail under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 for his release on bail in connection with the offence registered as I-C.R. No. 410/2011 filed before the Ellis Bridge Police Station, Ahmedabad for the offences p...
High Court Of Gujarat
Faridaben vs Mr Supehia For
Judges:
15 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA) Rule.Learned counsel, Mr.Supehia, appearing for the respondent waives service. Delay of 160 days in preferring the appeal is condoned in view of the uncontroverted averments made in the application. Rule is made absolute with no order as to costs.(D.H.Waghel...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sanjiv vs State
Judges:
15 March, 2012·Heard in part.Stand over to 19.3.2012.[ANANT S. DAVE, J.] //smita// Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rameshbhai vs Chairman
Judges:
15 March, 2012·The cause list shows that the Notice is not received back. Therefore, office is directed to await the service of process until 3rd April 2012. If the notice is not received back by that time, office to list the present petition for further orders on 5th April 2012.(K.M.THAKER, J.) jani Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kaushalyaba vs State
Judges:
15 March, 2012·Notice returnable on 17th April 2012.(K.M.THAKER, J.) jani Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
New vs Hanshaben
Judges:
15 March, 2012·Heard.In view of the averments made in the application, Civil Application is allowed in terms of para 5 (a) & (b ).Fresh notice to the unserved respondent/s as per the prayer clause returnable on 30.04.2012.(K.S.JHAVERI, J.) Divya// Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Manager vs Suo
Judges:
15 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and after going through the explanation given by the concerned respondent, the time granted in our order dated November 30, 2011 is extended till April 30, 2012, as a last chance.Let...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bajaj vs Vidhyaben
Judges:
15 March, 2012·1. In connection with the vehicular accident that took place on 15.03.2008 in which Ashokbhai Mohanbhai Machhi expired, the heirs and legal representatives of deceased preferred claim petition being M.A.C.P. No.463/2008 u/s.163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, V...
High Court Of Gujarat
Nagjibhai vs State
Judges:
15 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE)1. Heard learned advocate, Mr. Dipak H. Sindhi for the petitioner and learned APP, Mr. R. C. Kodekar for the respondents No.1 to 3.2. There is a unanimity on the point that the corpus has been traced and has been handed over to the petitioner, who is a father of...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kantaben vs Gujarat
Judges:
15 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) Rule.Since Mrs Raval waives service of rule on behalf of respondent No.1 and Ms. Shruti Pathak, learned Assistant Government Pleader waives service on behalf of respondent No.2, we treat the matter as ready as regards service.After ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.