None For Respondent(S) : vs 3
Judges:
19 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA) Rule returnable on 17th April, 2012. Direct Service.[D.H. WAGHELA, J.] [N.V. ANJARIA, J.] Amit Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance vs Notice Served For
Judges:
19 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) Finding that the original record came to be destroyed by the Trial Court, we had in our order dated 5.3.2012, called for explanation from the concerned Court. Pursuant to such direction, one Smt. R.H. Jani, In-charge Registrar, City Civil and Sessions Court...
High Court Of Gujarat
Chaudhary vs Deputy
Judges:
19 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) Rule.Learned AGP, Mr. Rindani waives service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondent.Appellant seek condonation of delay of 701 days in filing first appeal. Counsel for the applicant pointed out that this appeal is in the nature of cross appeal. The G...
High Court Of Gujarat
Chaudhary vs Deputy
Judges:
19 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) Rule.Learned AGP, Ms. Mehta waives service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondents.Appellant seeks condonation of delay of 701 days in filing first appeal. Counsel for the applicant pointed out that this appeal is in the nature of cross appeal. The G...
High Court Of Gujarat
Fr vs State
Judges:
19 March, 2012·This application is filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with First Information Report registered as II-C.R. No.3058/2012 with Anand Town Police Station, Anand for the offences punishable under Sections 295, 153(3) and 114 of the Indian Penal Code.Learned Counsel f...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rajeshkumar vs State
Judges:
19 March, 2012·Learned AGP has requested for time upto 22.3.2012 as the reply affidavit, which has been prepared by her, is unfiled and served to petitioner, has unfortunately not available in her file and in court's paper.Be that as it may. The request for time upto 22.3.2012 is granted overruling the objection o...
High Court Of Gujarat
Pankajkumar Ramanlal Jariwala vs Manchiben W
Judges:
19 March, 2012·It appears that the notice have not been received for respondent Nos. 5,7,9 and 10. Issue fresh notice to respondent Nos. 5,7,9 and 10 returnable on 3rd April, 2012. As far as respondent No. 1/7 is concerned he has expired as unserved and his legal heirs to be brought on record within two weeks.(Ms....
High Court Of Gujarat
Nainaz vs State
Judges:
19 March, 2012·Issue notice returnable on 27.3.2012.Direct service is permitted.(ANANT S. DAVE, J.) (swamy) Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Nayanaben vs State
Judges:
19 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI) This application is relating to service matter. Such matters are heard by another Division Bench. Office has wrongly listed this matter before this Bench. Office may list this matter before the appropriate Bench at the earliest after obtaining necessary nomi...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.