Ishwarbhai vs Dist
Judges:
30 March, 2012·Heard.On the facts and circumstances of the case, sufficient cause is shown to condone the delay. The delay is, therefore, condoned and the application is allowed. Rule is made absolute with no order as to costs.The main matter shall be listed for admission on 13th April, 2012.(K.S.JHAVERI,J.) pawan...
High Court Of Gujarat
Dena vs Official
Judges:
30 March, 2012·NOTICE returnable on 24.4.2012.[R.M.CHHAYA, J.] mrpandya Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Pannaben vs Addl.Spl.Laq
Judges:
30 March, 2012·At the request made by learned advocate Mr.Satyam Chhaya for the respondent No.2, the matter is adjourned to 16th April 2012, to enable him to take necessary instructions.[ RAJESH H. SHUKLA, J. ] vijay Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kuvarben vs State
Judges:
30 March, 2012·It is submitted by learned advocate, Mr.Nikhil Kariel for the applicant that the applicant had preferred application under Sec.482 of Cr.P.C. wherein following order has been passed by the Court (Coram: Anant S.Dave,J.) vide order dated 19-3-2012 passed in Cri.Misc.Appln.No.3946 of 2012:"Upon consid...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rakeshbhai vs Laljibhai
Judges:
30 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI) Heard learned advocates for the respective parties.The applications for joining the parties are allowed. The newly added joining parties shall file the affidavits-in-reply within two weeks in the main matter. The applications are accordingly disposed of with...
High Court Of Gujarat
Meenaben vs State
Judges:
30 March, 2012·Issue notice returnable on 20th April, 2012.Direct service is permitted through police station.(Ms.Sonia Gokani,J) bina Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Meghna vs State
Judges:
30 March, 2012·Rule.Learned AGP Mrs. Pathak waives service of notice of rule on behalf of opponents.2. This application is filed by applicant with a prayer to condone the delay of 108 days caused in preferring Miscellaneous Civil Application for review (Stamp) No.46 of 2012 in Special Civil application No.7197 of ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Manan vs State
Judges:
30 March, 2012·Considering the submissions advanced on behalf of both the sides, and more particularly, considering the order dated 5.7.2011 passed in this matter, it transpires that upon the submission being made on behalf of the applicants that the dispute between the parties has been amicable settled, and only ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Nitin vs Unknown
Judges:
30 March, 2012·Office is directed to list Criminal Appeal No.1423 of 2010 with this matter, in seriatim.(Z.K.SAIYED,J.) ynvyas Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bharti vs Ahmedabad
Judges:
30 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) Draft amendment prayed for by the petitioner is allowed. Amendment to be carried out forthwith.As prayed for by Ms. Jirga Jhaveri, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent, let the matter appear on April 18, 2012. Reply...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.