Legal vs Nathalal
Judges:
20 March, 2012·At the request of Shri Majmudar, learned appearing on behalf of the appellant, Registry is directed to issue fresh rule upon the unserved respondents nos. 1 and 4 at the fresh address already supplied making it returnable on 02/04/2012.Direct service is permitted.(M.R.SHAH, J.) siji Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kalim vs State
Judges:
20 March, 2012·Learned Advocate for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition at this stage.Permission as prayed for is granted.In view of the above, this petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Rule discharged.Sd/-(M.D.Shah, J.) Caroline Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
M/S vs Registrar
Judges:
20 March, 2012·1. Mr.Utkarsh B. Jani, learned advocate for the petitioner has filed further affidavit along with documents in compliance of the earlier order dated 02.03.2012 passed in this matter.2. Mr.Y.V.Vaghela, learned Central Government Counsel for the respondent-Registrar of Companies states that the detail...
High Court Of Gujarat
Surat vs Unknown
Judges:
20 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) This Appeal is admitted on the following substantial questions of law :(A) Whether the Tribunal below committed substantial error of law in confirming the disallowance of Rs.20,61,339/- and Rs.27,55,86,464/- claim of set off of loss...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance vs Counsel
Judges:
20 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI)1. Counsel for the applicant pointed out that in Special Civil Application No.822 of 2011, learned Single Judge of this Court passed an order on 31.1.2011, wherein directions were issued to decide the representation of the petitioner within three months from...
High Court Of Gujarat
Samimbanu vs State
Judges:
20 March, 2012·[1] This petition is directed against the order of detention dated 02.11.2011 passed by respondent No.2, in exercise of powers conferred under Section 3(1) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 (in short" the Act) by detaining the detenu as a "bootlegger" as defined under Sec...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jagdishchandra vs E.D.Asset
Judges:
20 March, 2012·The original record pertaining to the issue involved in the present petition is required for deciding the matter. The respondent No.4 shall therefore place the original records before this Court on the next date of hearing. If the original records are lying with the Tribunal, the respondent No.4 wil...
High Court Of Gujarat
Manseta vs Mrudulaben
Judges:
20 March, 2012·Issue notice returnable on 9th April, 2012 by R.P.A.D Direct service is permitted.(Ms.Sonia Gokani) bina Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Gujarat vs Abdulbhai
Judges:
20 March, 2012·Rule is expedited. Since, granting of interim relief would amount to allowing the present petition, the same is not granted. It is expected that the petitioner-Corporation shall reinstate the respondent. However, the further order regarding back wages and other benefits shall be passed, subject to t...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.