United vs Bhaijibhai
Judges:
22 March, 2012·Learned counsel for the appellant prays for and is allowed to delete respondent No.8 from the array of respondents as he is a Driver.Notice to respondent No.5 returnable on 12th April 2012. It is open for the appellant to serve respondent No.5 by Registered Post AD over and above regular service.(K....
High Court Of Gujarat
Dudhiben vs State
Judges:
22 March, 2012·The endorsement on the Board indicates that Notice issued to respondents Nos.2 and 3 have not been received back, either served or unserved. Registry to await the service of notices upon the said respondents.List on 19.04.2012.(Smt.Abhilasha Kumari, J.) (sunil) Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mahendrasinh vs State
Judges:
22 March, 2012·Though served, no one appears for respondent No.2.Having heard learned advocate for the petitioner and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, ad-interim relief in terms of para 8[C] is granted till further order.[Anant S. Dave, J.] *pvv Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kalpeshkumar vs State
Judges:
22 March, 2012·Mr.K.V.Shelat, learned advocate for the petitioners, submits that though it has been endorsed on the Board that Notice issued to respondent No.3 could not be served as the said respondent has left the place, upon verification, it is found that the said respondent still resides at the given address, ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mithabhai vs State
Judges:
22 March, 2012·When the petition is called out and taken up for hearing, learned advocate Mr. Bhatt for respondent is not present. Therefore, as a last chance, opportunity is granted to the respondent to make affidavit. S. O. to 30/03/2012.(K.M.THAKER, J.) (ila) Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Pavanbhai Mohanbhai Joshi ­ vs State Of Gujarat & 2 ­
Judges:
22 March, 2012·PAVANBHAI MOHANBHAI JOSHI Applicant(s) Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & 2 Respondent(s) ========================================= Appearance :MR VIJAY H NANGESH for Applicant(s) : 1, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for Respondent(s) : 1, None for Respondent(s) : 2 3. ========================================= CORAM...
High Court Of Gujarat
Pareshkumar Madhavsinh Vaghela ­ vs Urvashiben Takhatsinh Gohel . ­
Judges:
22 March, 2012·PARESHKUMAR MADHAVSINH VAGHELA Applicant(s) Versus URVASHIBEN TAKHATSINH GOHEL . Respondent(s) ========================================= Appearance :MR Y C PANDYA for Applicant(s) : 1, None for Respondent(s) : 1, ========================================= CORAM : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANANT S. DA...
High Court Of Gujarat
Chintan vs State
Judges:
22 March, 2012·1. Heard learned advocate, Mr.N.K.Raval for the applicant.2. This Court has gone through the averments made in the application as well as the complaint and the documents produced by the applicant - accused. The applicant will not be arrested without the permission of the Court by the Investigating O...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bhavnaben vs State
Judges:
22 March, 2012·[1] Rule.Ms.C.M.Shah, learned APP waives service of rule on behalf of the respondent - State.[2] By way of present application, filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicant has prayed to release her on regular bail in connection with C.R.No.I-110 of 2011 registered ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Icici vs Fahimuddin
Judges:
22 March, 2012·Heard.In view of the averments made in the application, the same is granted in terms of para 3[A], [B] and [C]. The application stands disposed of accordingly.[K.S.JHAVERI, J.] ORDER IN CIVIL APPLICATION :Fresh rule to respondent nos. 1, 3 and 4 returnable on 07.05.2012.[K.S.JHAVERI, J.] ORDER IN FI...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.