Hareshbhai vs Executive
Judges:
27 March, 2012·Ms.Amee Yajnik, learned advocate for the petitioner, prays for permission to join the State of Gujarat, through the concerned Secretary, as party respondent No.3.Permission to do so is granted. The necessary amendment in the cause-title be carried out forthwith.Issue Notice to the newly added respon...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance vs Learned
Judges:
27 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE) Learned advocate, Ms.Vashi for Mr. Unwala, learned advocate appearing for applicant, seeks time to delete respondent Nos.15 and 17 from the cause title. She prays for fresh notice in respect of respondent No.23. Fresh Notice, to respondent No.23, returnable on ...
High Court Of Gujarat
The vs Pravinchandra
Judges:
27 March, 2012·Office objections to be removed on or before 10/04/2012, failing which, Registry is directed to notify the matter for appropriate order of dismissing the same for non-prosecution on 13/04/2012.[M.R.SHAH,J] *dipti Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
State vs Unknown
Judges:
27 March, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL) Admit.To be heard with Criminal Appeal No. 886/2011.[JAYANT PATEL, J.] [PARESH UPADHYAY, J.] mandora/ Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sanjaysinh vs Surat
Judges:
27 March, 2012·1. This petition under Article-226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred, with the following prayers :"a) This Hon'ble Court be pleased to admit this petition.b) This Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus and certiorari or in the nature of mandamus or certiorari or any other...
High Court Of Gujarat
First Appeal No. 2969 Of 2 vs Mrs Nilima M Shah For Petitioner No
Judges:
27 March, 2012·1.Appellant-original claimant, by filing this appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, ('Act' for short), has challenged the order dated November 9, 2000, passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Aux.), Mehsana, below application Exh.5, filed by the appellant under Section 140 ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jolly vs State
Judges:
27 March, 2012·1. In this application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short "the Code") the following prayers in terms of para 23 is made by the applicant which reads as under:"23.(1) Admit this Criminal Misc. Application.Grant such ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Shantilal vs Ms Nisha M Thakore For
Judges:
27 March, 2012·In view of the order passed earlier dated 05.03.2012, learned advocate Mr.Utpal M. Panchal for the appellants was directed to give fresh address. However, learned advocate for the appellants has not given any such address as stated in the office note. When the matter is called out in both the sessio...
High Court Of Gujarat
Komalben vs State
Judges:
27 March, 2012·1. This Application has been preferred under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with the offence being CR No.I-32 of 2011 registered with D.C.B. Police Station, Ahmedabad for the offences Under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and under...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance: vs Served By Rpad - (R) For
Judges:
27 March, 2012·(Per : MR.JUSTICE K.R.VYAS) The learned counsel for the petitioners, by filing the note dated 23.7.2001 has sought liberty for withdrawal of this Special Civil Application by stating that the dispute between the parties has been settled. Accordingly, this petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. In...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.