Mayur vs State
Judges:
27 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR) Mr.Kamal Upadhyay, learned counsel appearing for Dr.Rajesh Acharya as well as M/s.Thakkar Associates, states that in view of subsequent development, the appellant is not now willing to proceed further with the Appeal and hence seeks permission to withdraw t...
High Court Of Gujarat
Amishkumar vs State
Judges:
27 June, 2012·At the request made on behalf of learned counsel, Mr.S.P. Majmudar stating that the settlement is likely to be arrived at, the matter is finally adjourned to enable the applicant to settle the matter to 25 th July, 2012, failing which, the matter shall proceed on the next date.(RAJESH H.SHUKLA, J.) ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rohit vs Surajben
Judges:
27 June, 2012·Notice returnable on 24.07.2012.Ad-interim relief in terms of paragraph No.7(B) is granted on condition that the petitioners shall maintain status-quo qua ownership and use of the land in question. Direct service is permitted.(R.M.CHHAYA, J.) Hitesh Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Commissioner vs Whether The
Judges:
27 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI)1. We have heard Mr.M.R.Bhatt, learned Senior counsel assisted by Ms.Mauna M.Bhatt, learned counsel appearing for the appellant.2. Admit.Connect with Tax Appeal No.1611 of 2010. We formulate the substantial question of law as under:1. Whether the Tribunal is ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Appearance vs Mr Harendra Banatwala For Mr Viral ...
Judges:
27 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL) ORDER IN FIRST APPEAL:ADMIT.ORDER IN CIVIL APPLICATION:1. Present application is for interim injunction pending the First Appeal against the judgment and decree of the Family Court, whereby the decree is passed for dissolution of marriage2. Heard learned co...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rajkot vs State
Judges:
27 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR) Learned Counsel for the appellant, Mr. Patel, states that in view of the fact that the considerable time has passed since the appeal is pending and as the batch of the students concerned have already cleared their examination long back, this matter has, now...
High Court Of Gujarat
Dashrath vs State
Judges:
27 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI) The present application is filed by the convict through Jail seeking temporary bail for a period of 30 days so as to undertake agricultural operations.2. RULE.Mr.L.R. Pujari, learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives service of rule on behalf of the re...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mahendra vs The
Judges:
27 June, 2012·The present acquittal Appeal has been filed by the State, under Section 378(4) Cr. P.C., against the Judgment and order dated 27.11.2000, rendered in PFA Case No.72 of 1995 by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Municipal Court, Surat. The said case was registered against the present respondent for the...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bharatkumar vs Panchayat
Judges:
27 June, 2012·In view of the statement made by the petitioner that even if the additional marks of Sports are not considered, the merit of the petitioner is 71.40% whereas the merit of last appointed candidate in SEBC category is 70.10%, issue Notice to the respondents returnable on 16.07.2012. Direct service is ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Shree vs The
Judges:
27 June, 2012·Record shows that rule is not served upon the private respondent Nos.4, 5 and 6. Hence, fresh NOTICE to the unserved respondents returnable on 23.07.2012. Over and above usual mode of service, the petitioner shall also affect service of rule by Regd. Post A.D. Sd/-[R.M.CHHAYA, J ] *** Bhavesh* Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.