Alpeshbhai vs Commissioner
Judges:
13 June, 2012·Heard Mr. Kunal S Shah, learned Advocate for the petitioner.RULE.Mr. Rashesh Rindani, learned Assistant Government Pleader waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of the jail authority. Direct service is permitted for rest of the respondents.Registry to list the matter for final hearing in seriat...
High Court Of Gujarat
Karankumar vs State
Judges:
13 June, 2012·Mr.SA Qureshi, learned advocate for the applicants does not press the application qua the applicants No.1,2 and 3 and seeks permission to withdraw the application qua them. Permission as prayed for is granted.The instant application is filed u/s.438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking anticipa...
High Court Of Gujarat
Union vs Batuk
Judges:
13 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.B.SHAH)1. We have heard learned counsel Mr Sudhir Mehta for the petitioners. Being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the impugned order dated 21.7.2011 passed by Central Administrative Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench in Review Application No.22 of 2011 and order dated 23.11...
High Court Of Gujarat
D vs State
Judges:
13 June, 2012·1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs :-"[a] allow this petition with cost in favour of the petitioner : and/or [b] direct respondent no. 1 to consider the case of the petitioner for grant of higher pay scale w.e.f. 20.01.1992 considering the representation ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mehboobbhai vs State
Judges:
13 June, 2012·Notice to respondent No.2 only, returnable on 27.06.2012.(R.M.CHHAYA, J.) Hitesh Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Arvindbhai vs Election
Judges:
13 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA) RULE returnable on 21.06.2012. Learned A.G.P. appearing for respondent No.1 and learned counsel Mr.Vijay Patel appearing for respondent No.2 waive service. In the meantime, by way of ad-interim relief, it is directed that impugned order dated 07.06.2012 at A...
High Court Of Gujarat
Saurashtra vs Paschim
Judges:
13 June, 2012·When the petition is called out and taken up for hearing, the advocates for the petitioners and the respondents are not present. Request for passover is made on behalf of the learned advocates for the petitioner and the respondents. As passover is not possible, hearing is adjourned.S.O. to 4.7.2012....
High Court Of Gujarat
Ravat vs District
Judges:
13 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE) Learned advocate Mr. Jain seeks permission to withdraw this application with a view to approach the appropriate forum having jurisdiction. Permission, as prayed for, is granted. Present application is disposed of as withdrawn.[A.L.Dave, J.] [A.J.Desai, J.] #MH ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Paresh vs The
Judges:
13 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.L.DAVE) In view of the fact that the main appeal is coming up for final hearing on 14.06.2012, the present application is disposed of.[A.L.Dave, J.] [A.J.Desai, J.] #MH Dave Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.