Navodaya vs Urmila
Judges:
14 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA) S.O.to 29.06.2012, ad-interim relief granted earlier to continue till then, by consent.[D H WAGHELA, J.] [G B SHAH, J.] msp Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sakarsha vs Jamnagar
Judges:
14 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA) By this writ-application, the writ petitioner has prayed for direction upon respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to remove illegal encroachment done by fishermen in the City Survey No. 54 of Jamnagar, so that the petitioner and their community p...
High Court Of Gujarat
Momammad vs State
Judges:
14 June, 2012·Rule.Mr.J.M.Panchal, learned Special Public Prosecutor for the respondent-State waives service of Rule for the respondent-State.The instant application is filed by party-in-person seeking parole leave for 60 days for his convict brother Mohammad Hanif, who came to be convicted in connection with var...
High Court Of Gujarat
Raendrabhai vs State
Judges:
14 June, 2012·Leave to amend.Notice returnable on 02.07.2012.Direct Service is permitted.[K.S.JHAVERI, J.] /phalguni/ Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Jayes vs State
Judges:
14 June, 2012·Heard Mr.Shaikh, learned Advocate for the petitioner.RULE.Ms.Mehta, learned Assistant Government Pleader waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of the jail authority. Direct Service is permitted for rest of the respondents.Registry to list the matter for final hearing in seriatim as per the actu...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ramjibhai vs Executive
Judges:
14 June, 2012·Mr.Hamesh Naidu, learned advocate states that he has received instructions to appear on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2 and prays for time in order to file the Vakalatnama and affidavit-in-reply.List on 05.07.2012.(Smt.Abhilasha Kumari, J.) Gaurav+ Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Noor Mohamed Rasulbhai Shaikhs vs Aaftabhussain Mubarakbhai Shaikhdeleted As Per Order Opponents
Judges: M R Shah
14 June, 2012·1. Present Civil Revision Application under section 29(2) of the Bombay Rent Act has been preferred by the petitioner herein – original defendant to quash and set aside the impugned judgement and decree dtd.31/3/1990 passed by the learned Civil Judge (J.D.), Rajpipla in Regular Civil Suit No.27 ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Chandangauri Wd/O Ishwarlal H Parekh & 5S vs Dahiben Wd/O Narottamdas Kalidas & 1
Judges: M R Shah
14 June, 2012·1. The present Civil Revision Application under Section 29 of the Bombay Rent Act has been preferred by the applicants- original plaintiffs to quash and set aside the impugned judgment and order passed by the learned appellate Court- learned 2nd Extra Assistant Judge, Navsari dated 24/01/200...
High Court Of Gujarat
Traders Private Ltds vs East India Pharmaceutical Works Ltd Opponents
Judges: M R Shah
14 June, 2012·Date : 14/06/2012 1. Present Civil Revision Application under section 29(2) of the Bombay Rent Act has been preferred by the petitioner herein - original plaintiff to quash and set aside the impugned judgement and order dtd.19/4/1995 passed by the learned appellate court - learned Extra Assista...
High Court Of Gujarat
Sureshbhai Dhirabhai Machhi vs Ratanbhai Bhikhabhai Machhi & 5 Defendants
Judges: M R Shah
14 June, 2012·Date : 14/06/2012 1.00. Present Second Appeal under section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been preferred by the appellants herein – heirs and legal representative of the original plaintiff to quash and set aside the impugned Judgement and Order passed by the learned appellate court -...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.