Rule.
Mr.J.M.Panchal, learned Special Public Prosecutor for the respondent-State waives service of Rule for the respondent-State.
The instant application is filed by party-in-person seeking parole leave for 60 days for his convict brother Mohammad Hanif, who came to be convicted in connection with various offences including the offence punishalbe under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code in different Pota Cases. The Party-in-Person submitted that son of his convict brother is required to be admitted for further better education as well as the daughter is also required to be admitted for better education.
I have taken into consideration the jail remark-sheet, so also the submissions advanced by Mr.J.M.Panchal, learned Special Public Prosecutor for the respondent-State.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that Party-in-Person Mohammad Yasin is real brother of the convict, who is residing in Ahmedabad City itself, the party in person can definitely take up the task of admission of his brother's son in good institution for his better education. To put it differently, the adult male member is available in the family to look after this affair. Hence, this application stands dismissed. Rule is discharge.
(J.C.UPADHYAYA,J.) Girish Top