Natvarbhai @ Natu Somabhai Thakkar vs Commissioner Of Police & 2
Judges: J C Upadhyaya
18 June, 2012·1. The petitioner detenu filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenging his detention pursuant to the detention order dated 11.01.2012, which was executed on 14.01.2012, passed by the respondent No. 1– The Police Commissioner, Ahmedabad City,...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ikbal Samshubhai Shaikh vs Commissioner Of Police & 2
Judges: J C Upadhyaya
18 June, 2012·The petitioner came to be detained by order dated 10.1.2012 passed by respondent No.1 Police Commissioner, Ahmedabad city. 2. The detaining authority in the reasons recorded that the petitionerdetenu is involved in offence punishable under Sections 5, 6, 6kha(1)(2()3), & 8 of the Gujarat An...
High Court Of Gujarat
Pankaj M Nayaks vs District Collector
Judges: Ks Jhaveri
18 June, 2012·1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:-(A) By a writ of certiorari or in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, direction or order, the judgement and order dated 9th January, 1995, passed in Appeal No.142 of 94 by the Gujarat Civil Service T...
High Court Of Gujarat
Hansaben Madanmohan Avasthi
Judges: S R Brahmbhatt, S R
18 June, 2012·IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 4863 of 2009 For Approval and Signature:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.R.BRAHMBHATT ====================================== 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?2 To be referred to the Reporter or not ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Maheshbhai Ramajibhai Rathod vs State Of Gujarat Through Secretary & 2
Judges: K M Thaker
18 June, 2012·The petitioner has taken out present petition seeking below mentioned relief/direction:- “8(B) YOUR LORDSHIP be pleased to quashed and set aside the order dtd 8/3/2009 passed by the Res. No.1 and directing the Res. no.1 to 3 to consider the case of the petitioner under the policy dtd 29/6/1988 ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Instruments And Control Company vs Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax I & 2
Judges: Akil Kureshi, Harsha Devani
18 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) 1. The petitioner has prayed for a refund of an amount of Rs.9,62,976/- with interest from the respondents. By way of amendment, an additional prayer was made to quash and set aside the assessment proceedings initiated by the respondents pursuant to the or...
High Court Of Gujarat
Vinit Rameshchandra Parikh & 2 vs Dinaben Mohanlal Shah
Judges: S R Brahmbhatt
18 June, 2012·1. Learned counsels for the parties have jointly requested for disposing of this matter, as both of them are having instructions from the respective clients for settling the matter.2. Shri Dipak Dave, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that he has been instructed by the petitioner to ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Dy C I T vs Sayaji Industries Ltd Opponents
Judges: Akil Kureshi, Harsha Devani
18 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI) 1) By these appeals under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the appellant-revenue has challenged the order dated 03.01.2000 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, whereby the appeals preferred by the revenue came to be dismissed.2) While admi...
High Court Of Gujarat
Dy C I T vs Sayaji Industries Ltd Opponents
Judges: Akil Kureshi, Harsha Devani
18 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI) 1) By these appeals under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the appellant-revenue has challenged the order dated 03.01.2000 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, whereby the appeals preferred by the revenue came to be dismissed.2) While admi...
High Court Of Gujarat
Imrankhan Mehboobkhan Belim & 1 vs State Of Gujarat Opponents
Judges: Bankim N Mehta
18 June, 2012·The appellants-convicts have preferred this appeal under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and challenged the impugned judgement and order of conviction and sentence passed by learned Sessions Judge, Mehsana, on 30.9.1998 in Sessions Case No. 36 of 1998 convicting ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.