Himmatsinh Madhavsinh Parmar & 2 Defendants
Judges: Anant S
18 June, 2012·The appellant-New India Assurance Co. Ltd. has preferred this appeal under section 173 of The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [for short, `the Act'] against the judgment and award dated 05.04.2003 passed by the MACT [Aux.], Surendranagar in MACP No.95 of 1997 awarding Rs.1,97,000/- with interest @9% p.a fr...
High Court Of Gujarat
Kailashben Wd/O Chandrakant Ambalal Patel & 3S
Judges: Anant S
18 June, 2012·This appeal is filed under Section 173 of The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [for short, `the Act, 1988'] by the appellant against the judgment and award dated 30.10.1999 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Vadodara at Vadodara in Motor Accident Claims Petition No.1713 of 1992 whereby the Tribu...
High Court Of Gujarat
Blank Name Defendants
Judges: M R Shah
18 June, 2012·1.0 Present Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been preferred by the appellantoriginal plaintiff to quash and set aside the impugned judgment and order dated 28.4.1986 passed by the learned 2nd Extra Assistant Judge, Junagadh passed in Regular Civil Appeal ...
High Court Of Gujarat
State Of Gujarat & 2
Judges: Md Shah
18 June, 2012·1. Heard learned AGP, Mr.P.P.Banaji. Board shows that rule is duly served upon the respondent. However, nobody appears on behalf of the respondent.2. The State Government as well as the claimants have preferred appeals against the common award passed by the Reference Court. This Court (Coram: Jayant...
High Court Of Gujarat
State Bank Of India
Judges: M R Shah
18 June, 2012·1. The present Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been preferred by the appellant- original defendant- State Bank of Saurashtra (now State Bank of India) to quash and set aside the impugned judgment and decree passed by the learned 2nd Extra Assistant Judge, Rajkot Ca...
High Court Of Gujarat
Shakil @ Pappu Safimohmad Qureshi Thro Brother vs State Of Gujarat Through Secretary &
Judges: J C Upadhyaya
18 June, 2012·The petitioner came to be detained by order dated 11.1.2012 passed by respondent No.2 Police Commissioner, Ahmedabad city. 2. The detaining authority in the reasons recorded that the petitionerdetenu is involved in offence punishable under Sections 5, 6, 7, 8 and 11 of the Gujarat Animal Pre...
High Court Of Gujarat
Harshad @ Kalu Bhurabhai Khantthro Friend Hanifkhan vs State Of Gujarat Thro The Secretary &
Judges: J C Upadhyaya
18 June, 2012·1. The petitioner detenu filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenging his detention pursuant to the detention order dated 14.01.2012, which was executed on 14.01.2012, passed by the respondent No. 2– The Police Commissioner, Vadodara City, ...
High Court Of Gujarat
All India Oriential Bank Officer Asso Guj Zone & 1 vs Union Of India & 3
Judges: Akil Kureshi, Harsha Devani
18 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI) 1) The petitioner No.1 is an association of officers and employees of the fourth respondent Oriental Bank of Commerce, whereas the petitioner No.2 is its secretary. By way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners see...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bhanat Rupajibhai Galajibhai vs Bhanat Pittarbhai Galajibhai & 11
Judges: M R Shah
18 June, 2012·1. The present Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been preferred by the appellant-original plaintiff to quash and set aside the impugned judgment and decree passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Idar dated 28/02/1984 in Regular Civil Suit No. 126/1974 b...
High Court Of Gujarat
Salim Usmanbhai Sumera Muslimkumbhar vs State Of Gujarat &
Judges: J C Upadhyaya
18 June, 2012·The petitioner came to be detained by order dated 06.1.2012 passed by respondent No.2 Police Commissioner, Ahmedabad city. 2. The detaining authority in the reasons recorded that the petitionerdetenu is involved in offence punishable under Sections 3, 5, 6, 8 and 10 of the Gujarat Animal Pre...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.