Kishore vs Unknown
Judges:
29 June, 2012·1. The present petition has been preferred by Kishore Vadilal Private Limited (De-merged Company) in the proposed Scheme of Arrangement, in the nature of de-merger and transfer of the de-merged Undertakings II and III of the petitioner company to SA Innovations Private Limited and Ratnamani Medi Ser...
High Court Of Gujarat
Arvind vs Ratansinh
Judges:
29 June, 2012·The learned advocate for the petitioner has moved a draft amendment. The same is granted and may be carried out, within a period of two days.Heard Mr.S.P.Majmudar, learned advocate for the petitioner. It is submitted that respondent No.1 was working in a Managerial Cadre, and was not a workman, ther...
High Court Of Gujarat
Eshaani vs The
Judges:
29 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.MAJMUDAR)1. The present appeal is filed by the appellant against the order dated 07.10.2011 passed by the learned Single Judge in Company Petition No.242 of 2009. By the impugned order the learned Single Judge dismissed the petition filed by the petitioner being Comp...
High Court Of Gujarat
Maniben vs Ministry
Judges:
29 June, 2012·(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA) Notice returnable on 4th July 2012. Learned counsel Mr. Karnavat appears for respondent No. 1. Direct service for respondent Nos. 2 and 3. To be listed with Special Civil Application No. 14266 of 2011.[ D. H. Waghela, J. ] [ G. B. Shah, J. ] hiren Top...
High Court Of Gujarat
Mr Chaitanya S Joshi For vs None For Respondent(S)
Judges:
29 June, 2012·The present Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India as well as under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code for the prayer that FIR being I-Cr No. 220 of 2011 registered with Deesa City Police Station may be quashed and set aside qua the present Petitioner.Heard le...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ranjitsinh vs Tower
Judges:
29 June, 2012·Petitioners are the co-owners and joint holders of the land bearing Survey No. 534, Khata No.14 admeasuring Hector-AreSquare Meter 0.43.50 of Village Bhojwa, Taluka Viramgam, District Ahmedabad as averred in the petition. Respondent No.2 is one of the joint co-owners permitted respondent No.1- Compa...
High Court Of Gujarat
Rajshi vs State
Judges:
29 June, 2012·Seeking cancellation of regular bail granted to the respondent no.2 herein, this application is preferred by the complainant under Section 439 (2) CrPC.During the course of hearing of this application, it has been pointed out to this Court that enlargement of the respondent no.2 on regular bail was ...
High Court Of Gujarat
Bhanuben vs Commissioner
Judges:
29 June, 2012·Learned AGP Mr. Rakesh Rindani states that the order of detention passed by respondent No. 1, impugned in this petition stands revoked by the competent authority as per the recommendation of the Advisory Board.In view of the above statement made by learned AGP, the subject matter of the petition doe...
High Court Of Gujarat
Ahejaj vs State
Judges:
29 June, 2012·Learned AGP Ms. Maithili Mehta states that the order of detention passed by respondent No. 2, impugned in this petition stands revoked by the competent authority as per the recommendation of the Advisory Board.In view of the above statement made by learned AGP, the subject matter of the petition doe...
High Court Of Gujarat
Vijay vs State
Judges:
29 June, 2012·Learned AGP Ms. Shruti Pathak states that the order of detention passed by respondent No. 2, impugned in this petition stands revoked by the competent authority as per the recommendation of the Advisory Board.In view of the above statement made by learned AGP, the subject matter of the petition does...
High Court Of Gujarat
Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, Refund Policy and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.